Planet Earth is not a perfect sphere. Its polar diameter (from pole to pole) differs from equatorial diameter (diameter at the equator). This in turn means that the circumference of the two will also differ. Its dimensions are listed below (dimensions are rounded to the nearest whole mile): Polar Diameter: 7,900 miles (12,714 kilometers) Polar Circumference: 24,860 miles (40,008 kilometers) Equatorial Diameter: 7,927 miles (12,757 kilometers) Equatorial Circumference: 24,902 miles (40,076 kilometers) Earth's total surface is an area that measuring 197,000,000 square miles (09,600,000 square kilometers)
Depends upon which diameter you are referring to because it has many diameters - mindful of the fact that the earth is not perfectly round and in fact is somewhat oval - with the Poles being somewhat flat - compared to the Equatorial areas. So the diameter measured from Pole to Pole is less than when measured from a point on the Equator to a point on the exact opposite side of the Earth - also on the Equator.
Calculation of distance vs. scale. When the entire earth is in view, you would simply scale the size of the earth from your view by the distance it is from you. It's not the most exact method, but when considering how massive the earth is, it's probably close enough (as you would only be a few meters off)
No, the size of a rainbow is not related to the size of the Earth. The size of a rainbow is determined by the angle of light refraction and the position of the observer relative to the arc of the rainbow, not the size of the Earth.
It is difficult to estimate the exact number of footballs that could fit on planet Earth as it would depend on the size of the footballs and how tightly they were packed. However, as a rough estimate, assuming standard size footballs and full coverage of Earth's surface, you could possibly fit tens of billions to hundreds of billions of footballs.
earth is 5th number in term of size
Of the known planets, Venus is closest in size to the Earth.
they are the same exact size
No, a globe is a scaled-down model of the Earth that represents our planet's features in a more manageable size. It provides an accurate representation of the Earth's shape, landmasses, and oceans, but it is not an exact replica due to the inherent challenges in scaling down the vast size of the Earth.
Erastosthes was the first person to attempt to figure out the size of the earth, and although he was not exact, he was very close for his time. He lived in the third Century BC
The sun is much larger than Earth, with a diameter about 109 times greater. In terms of volume, the sun is about 1.3 million times larger than Earth.
what is the exact size of the pilippines money
No It's not. There will be discrepancies that won't be accounted for such as erosion, curvature, size, etc. - Wiki sucks -
No planet is the exact same size as the Earth but Venus is very close (it is just a little bit smaller) Mars is even smaller. See Link for a tour of planets and stars arranged by size.
There really is no EXACT size, but they are usually about the size of a normal horse foal.
it depends on where on earth it is.Sorry if it didn't help
No, Earth does not have a twin planet. While astronomers have discovered many exoplanets that are similar in size or composition to Earth, none are considered an exact replica or twin of our planet.
56 to be exact 56 to be exact
The size of dudley is 546km and this is exact.