Two pertinent pieces. One is the genetic material kept on round form in these organelles that still codes for a few proteins, The other pertinent evidence is the means of reproduction of these organelles; they preform cellular fission, just as bacteria would.
Mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own DNA, ribosomes, and some machinery for protein synthesis. They can replicate independently of the cell through a process called binary fission. Additionally, they have double membranes, which suggest that they may have originated from engulfed prokaryotic organisms that formed a symbiotic relationship with the ancestral eukaryotic cell.
They retain their own DNA, which is separate from the DNA of the cell they are in.
They are only semi-autonomous because most of the functions of mitochondria are now incorporated into the cell DNA (and they therefore divide when the rest of the cell does).
The endosymbiotic theory suggests that mitochondria and chloroplasts were once free-living organisms based on evidence such as their own circular DNA, ability to replicate independently of the host cell, and presence of double membranes similar to prokaryotic cells. Additionally, mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own ribosomes and produce some of their own proteins, similar to bacteria.
Lynn Margulis is the American biologist known for her work on the endosymbiotic theory. She proposed that chloroplasts and mitochondria evolved from ancient prokaryotic cells that were engulfed by a host cell. Her research provided evidence supporting the idea that these organelles have their own DNA and replicate independently within eukaryotic cells.
This is a relatively complicated question as the exact origins of mitochondria and how they came to be included in eukaryotic cells is still under investigation and therefore open to debate.Everyone seems to agree though, that they originally come from bacterium and that they were assimilated into eukaryotic cells either because they were useful or through some form of symbiosis.As mitochondria are common to both plant and animal cells it could therefore be argued that they shared a common ancestor at some point in evolution.The inclusion of the chloroplast came later, and a separate line of mitochondrial and chloroplast carrying cells evolved - eventually becoming plants. The line without the chloroplast becoming animals.
Scientists suspect that mitochondria and chloroplasts were originally prokaryotic cells because they have their own DNA, ribosomes, and are capable of replicating independently within the cell. Additionally, these organelles have double membranes, similar to some prokaryotic cells that may have been engulfed by early eukaryotic cells through endosymbiosis.
Mitochondria and chloroplasts were likely free-living bacteria that were engulfed by ancient cells through endosymbiosis. Over time, they became integrated into the host cell and developed a mutually beneficial relationship. They still retain some characteristics of their bacterial ancestors, such as their own DNA and the ability to replicate independently within the cell.
Mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own DNA.
Mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own DNA.
mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own DNA
...eukaryotic organelles, such as mitochondria and chloroplasts. These organelles have their own DNA, ribosomes, and are similar in size to prokaryotes like bacteria. Additionally, the double membrane structures of mitochondria and chloroplasts resemble what is seen in prokaryotic cells.
Mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own DNA
The endosymbiotic hypothesis postulates that an early eukaryotic cells lacking mitochondria and chloroplasts phagocytosed early aerobic prokaryotes and photosynthetic prokaryotes and rather than
Evidence for endosymbiotic theory includes the presence of organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts that have their own DNA and ribosomes, similar to prokaryotic cells. Additionally, these organelles reproduce independently within cells, similar to bacteria. Genetic sequencing has shown that the DNA of mitochondria and chloroplasts is more closely related to bacterial DNA than to the DNA of the eukaryotic host cell.
The mitochondria contain their own DNA in plants and animals; and chloroplasts contain their own DNA in plants and other photosynthetic organisms. Both of these structures divide (almost like cells) inside the cells.*This is also evidence for the theory of endosymbiosis, in which early cells ate early prokarotic cells (bacteria) and gained new organelles.
Mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own dna
The endosymbiotic theory suggests that mitochondria and chloroplasts were once free-living organisms based on evidence such as their own circular DNA, ability to replicate independently of the host cell, and presence of double membranes similar to prokaryotic cells. Additionally, mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own ribosomes and produce some of their own proteins, similar to bacteria.
Lynn Margulis is the American biologist known for her work on the endosymbiotic theory. She proposed that chloroplasts and mitochondria evolved from ancient prokaryotic cells that were engulfed by a host cell. Her research provided evidence supporting the idea that these organelles have their own DNA and replicate independently within eukaryotic cells.
1.) Mitochondria and plastids are relatively the same size as bacteria 2.) Mitochondria and plastids have nucleiod DNA molecules - just like bacteria. 3.) Mitochondria and plastids reproduce the same way as bacteria - binary fission.