The discovery of hot Jupiters challenges the nebular theory by suggesting that some gas giants can form close to their parent star, rather than further out in the outer regions of the solar system. This suggests that migration of gas giants can occur, and that not all planets form in their original location as predicted by the nebular theory.
"The theory was not based on accurate observations" does not describe a scientifically reasonable explanation for why the nebular theory failed to predict the existence of hot Jupiters. The actual reason is that hot Jupiters were not part of the original models due to limitations in our understanding of planet formation and migration processes.
The Big Bang is a theory that discusses the origin of the universe (from a single point source of incredible density and energy) while the Nebular Hypothesis is a theory that discusses the origins of stars and their planetary systems (through the accretion of interstellar gas).
The Big Bang is the theory that was developed to describe the origins of the universe.
No. The formation of a star system is a chaotic process, and even if all initial conditions are known, the end results will be practically impossible to predict exactly.
If you have studied hard in life science you should know this but the real answer is that yes the nebular hypothesis was made by helium and hydrogen..
"The theory was not based on accurate observations" does not describe a scientifically reasonable explanation for why the nebular theory failed to predict the existence of hot Jupiters. The actual reason is that hot Jupiters were not part of the original models due to limitations in our understanding of planet formation and migration processes.
the formation of the universe
partcles heading towards one anther take on characteristics because going away from its origin causes partcles to resist that direction ,it cant go in its origin direction but in its opposite purging direction flat flaten out so how do you no which one you are you cant mirrors lie
The answer is Nebular Theory
the nebular theory
The main difference between the nebular and condensation theories is their emphasis on different aspects of planet formation. Nebular theory focuses on the collapse of a rotating nebula to form a star and planets, while condensation theory emphasizes the role of solid particles (dust and gas) in the early stages of planet formation.
It was first proposed in 1734 by Emanuel Swedenborg. Originally applied only to our own Solar System, this method of planetary system formation is now thought to be at work throughout the universe. The widely accepted modern variant of the nebular hypothesis is Solar Nebular Disk Model (SNDM) or simply Solar Nebular Model.
The nebular hypothesis is the most widely accepted model explaining the formation and evolution of the Solar System.
The nebular hypothesis explains the formation of the solar system from a rotating cloud of gas and dust. It suggests that the Sun and planets formed from a spinning disk of material that condensed due to gravity.
The stages of the Nebular theory are: 1. Nebula formation - a giant molecular cloud collapses under its own gravity. 2. Disk formation - the nebula flattens into a spinning disk due to conservation of angular momentum. 3. Planetesimal formation - small particles in the disk collide and stick together to form planetesimals. 4. Planet formation - these planetesimals continue to collide and merge to form planets.
The nebular theory suggests that the solar system formed from a massive cloud of dust and gas called a nebula. The steps of this theory involve the collapse of the nebula under gravity, the formation of a protostar at the center, the accretion of material into planets and other celestial bodies, and the clearing of the remaining debris to form a stable solar system.
The formation of the solar system from a huge cloud of dust and gases is called solar nebular hypothesis. This theory suggests that a rotating disk of gas and dust collapsed under its own gravity, forming the Sun and planets.