Want this question answered?
Having evidence to support a statement is important because it adds credibility and strengthens the argument being made. Evidence helps to validate the claim and gives others a reason to believe or trust in the information being provided. Without evidence, statements can be seen as purely opinion-based and lacking in credibility.
Fjh
The addition of molecular evidence supported the hypothesis made earlier based on structural evidence. Molecular evidence provides additional data that can confirm or strengthen hypotheses that are based on structural evidence.
Democritus did not have experimental evidence to support his idea of the atom. Instead, his idea was based on philosophical reasoning and speculation.
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
I do not so much " believe it " as I an convinced by the myriad lines of converging evidences that support the theory of evolution by natural selection. talkorigins.org
Corroborate means to strengthen or support with evidence.
Most believe that he was born in Haiti, but there is no documentary evidence to support or refute that belief.
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
Having evidence to support a statement is important because it adds credibility and strengthens the argument being made. Evidence helps to validate the claim and gives others a reason to believe or trust in the information being provided. Without evidence, statements can be seen as purely opinion-based and lacking in credibility.
If you believe in the concept of a soul then it is invisible, bodiless and shapeless. So far their is no evidence to support the concept of a soul though anyone with any evidence should post it in the discussion
There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of ghosts. Reports of ghost sightings and experiences are often attributed to psychological factors, natural explanations, or hoaxes.
Yes, an incredulous person can come to believe in what is happening if they are presented with enough evidence or convincing argument to support the truth of the situation. Their initial skepticism can be overcome with strong evidence and reasoning.
I think there is, there is photographic evidence and i am currently working on the scientific evidence. (i.e how deep does the lochness have to be and could it support the monster?)=if anyone finds any pure evidence the let me know by answering this question: is the any pure evidence for the lochness monster?=
Evidence suggesting we could be experiencing a sixth mass extinction includes the high rate of species extinction, the loss of biodiversity, and the significant impact of human activities such as habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change on ecosystems worldwide. Trends in population decline and habitat loss further support the hypothesis of a sixth mass extinction event.
Some believe so, and there is some evidence to support the idea. But, he failed miserably by leaving Stalin to take his place.
Scientists who believe in global warming use various types of evidence, including temperature data, sea level rise, melting ice caps, and changes in weather patterns. They also rely on computer models that simulate future climate scenarios based on current trends. These pieces of evidence collectively suggest that the Earth's climate is indeed warming due to human activities.