Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
They are considered living.
Absolutely, and they may also be considered as prototypes for eukaryotic cells.
No, not all living things contain cells. Viruses, for example, are considered living but are not made up of cells. They are instead composed of genetic material encased in a protein coat.
No, not all living things have cells. While all living things are made up of cells, some organisms like viruses are considered living but do not have cells. Instead, viruses are composed of genetic material (DNA or RNA) enclosed in a protein coat.
No, cells are the basic structural and functional units of all living organisms, but not all living things are made up entirely of cells. Some organisms, like viruses, are considered "acellular" because they are not made up of cells but still exhibit characteristics of living things.
Because it has cells. Anything with cells is considered living.
No, red blood cells are not considered living organisms because they lack a nucleus and other organelles typically found in living cells.
All cells are living. It is considered a plant cell.
They are considered living.
The blood cells that make up blood are considered 'living.'
They are both filled with living material.
Yes, cells are considered living organisms because they exhibit the characteristics of life, such as growth, reproduction, and response to stimuli.
No, a cell is not considered an organism. Cells are the basic building blocks of living organisms, but an organism is a complete living entity made up of multiple cells working together.
No, red blood cells are not considered to be alive because they lack a nucleus and other organelles typically found in living cells.
Every thing is made of one or more cells
Viruses are considered non-living because they are not cells. They do not exhibit some characteristics of life such as reproduction and growth.
Absolutely, and they may also be considered as prototypes for eukaryotic cells.