answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

yes as government water is not constant in all areas. in fact in rural areas they get water supply for barely 3-4 hours on alternate days. but if private companies take over they have to ensure that people get clean pure water 24/7 as it is their job and the people will be paying extra for it. Also the water supplied by the government is not always clean and may have bacterial content. This may be the reason for people to get sick and hence not only will they pay for impure water but also pay extra as medical bills for their treatment. Therefore, i say that water should be

privatized.

Good answer. As a simple addition to the correct one already here, New York City owns its own water supply and has excellent water.

As far as cost is concerned, water companies are regulated re: price of water. As far as I can tell, an engineer working for the public NYC water supply is paid about the same as an engineer working for a private but Govt. regulated water supply.

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

βˆ™ 6mo ago

Water is a necessity for all living beings and should be managed sustainably to ensure access for all. Privatization of water can lead to issues of accessibility, affordability, and equity, and may prioritize profits over the well-being of communities. It is crucial for governments to regulate water resources effectively to ensure they are managed in the public interest.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Should water be privatised
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions