0
Scientific what are the best explanations so far to explain a pattern seen in nature?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Well, the most common and liable explanation is that semen was poured into the mouth. Once the anus was visible then the real reasons were clear. So basically you can see a clear pattern in nature. Puting the large engorged penis into the vagina will cause climax.
Lmfao whoever said that man, i was looking for an actual answer!
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Some of the best explanations for patterns seen in nature come from theories such as natural selection, which explains the diversity of life based on genetic variation and adaptation to the environment, and chaos theory, which explores complex systems by examining non-linear and unpredictable behaviors. Additionally, the principles of thermodynamics help explain patterns in energy flow and organization within natural systems.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which term describes an observed pattern in nature with out any attempts to explain it?
A phenomenon describes an observed pattern in nature without an attempt to explain its underlying causes.
Does a scientific hypothesis describe an observed pattern in nature without attempting to explain it?
False
A statement that summarizes an observed pattern in nature is called a?
scientific law
What is Scientific approach in chemistry make a scientific law observation hypothesis theory scientific law?
In chemistry, the scientific approach involves making observations, forming hypotheses to explain the observations, testing these hypotheses through experiments, and developing theories that can explain a set of related observations. A scientific law is a concise statement or equation that describes a fundamental relationship or pattern in nature that has been consistently observed through experiments. It represents a well-established fact that is widely accepted in the scientific community.
What is Scientific explanations?
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
Is a scientific law an attempt to explain an observed pattern in nature?
Yes.
Which term describes an observed pattern in nature with out any attempts to explain it?
A phenomenon describes an observed pattern in nature without an attempt to explain its underlying causes.
Does a scientific hypothesis describe an observed pattern in nature without attempting to explain it?
False
True or false- if false please fill in the blank Unlike a scientific theory a scientific hypothesis describes an observed pattern in nature without attempting to explain it replace hypothesis?
True. Unlike a scientific theory, a scientific model describes an observed pattern in nature without attempting to explain it.
Which term describes an observed pattern in nature without any attempt to explain it?
scientific law
What is the main similarity between scientific theories and scientific laws?
The main similarity between scientific theories and scientific laws is that both are supported by extensive evidence and are used to explain natural phenomena. However, theories are broader explanations that can be modified or refined based on new evidence, while laws are specific statements that describe a consistent pattern observed in nature.
Explain why science can only provide possible explanations for occurrences in nature?
help a firend out
How did the scientific nature of nature change during the scientific revolution?
Scientist used abstract reasoning to explain how something happened.
What is a reason a theory cannot become a law?
A theory cannot become a law because they are different aspects of scientific understanding. Theories are comprehensive explanations that incorporate observations and evidence, while laws are concise statements that describe a specific relationship or pattern in nature. Laws do not explain why phenomena occur, which is the role of theories.
What describes patterns in nature with trying to explain them?
The study of patterns in nature without explaining them is called descriptive science. It involves identifying, documenting, and categorizing recurring patterns or structures in natural phenomena without delving into the underlying causes or mechanisms. This approach is commonly used in fields such as biology, ecology, and geology to aid in classification and observation.
How did the scientific view of nature change nature during the scientific revolution?
Scientist used abstract reasoning to explain how something happened.
How does a scienific law differ from a theory?
A scientific law describes a consistent pattern or relationship observed in nature, while a scientific theory explains why and how that pattern or relationship occurs. Laws are generally more specific and precise, providing a mathematical description, while theories are broader explanations based on evidence and experimentation.
