That might depend on whether it was constructive criticism or thinly-veiled insults, but I would listen calmly to the criticism, think carefully about what it might be telling me about myself, *and* about the critic themselves, and look for ways the criticism might help me behave more ethically or communicate more effectively in the future. Either way I choose not to take offence, as it really doesn't help. If the critic intends to offend you, taking offence only gratifies them. If they mean no offence, and simply have poor communication skills, taking offence makes their attempts to communicate even more frustrating. Choosing not to take offence is a skill, mastered through persistent practice.
I believe they'd are positively charged.
negatively charged
yes. negatively charged ion is called cation and where as a positively charged ion is anion.
No, humans are not positively charged. Humans are electrically neutral, meaning they have an equal number of positively charged protons and negatively charged electrons.
A jail is a place of confinement for people who have been charged with an offence.
A jail is a place of confinement for people who have been charged with an offence.
People have to be found guilty of an offence, not merely charged, before any sentence can be passed.
That depends upon the circumstances. You would certainly stand a chance of being charged for some offence but not neccessarily fraud.
I have been charged with an offence and need a solicitor to represent me at my court appearance.
The defendant is the person charged with the offence who is seated at the back of the court room until needed for giving evidence.
if you have been arrested for the offence, have been reported for the offence and you've received a summons to attend a court hearing then you will be guilty of a further offence. You can then be arrested and detained until another hearing is schedule. This will be added to the offense list by the prosecution. In some cases you can be found guilty in your absents and a sentence handed down. If you have not yet been charged the there is a possibility that the offence of theft is yet to be fully investigated and charges brought. It would NOT be advisable to FTA (Fail To Appear) if summoned as a judge will give instructions of "contempt of court".
Legally no. However if he or she was charged with an offence the judge would take into account the circumstances.
The likely sentence for any criminal offence depends on legislation in your area and how those laws are enforced within the justice system in your area, and upon the offence committed, and upon the person charged with committing the offence, as well as upon the circumstances of the offence. There is no universal or even narrowly local penalty for any specific, broadly-defined, offence.
A public program that is jointly funded jointly administered and jointly determined by both state and national government is an example of cooperative federalism.
In Canada, a hybrid offence is considered an indictable offence. For instance, there is no obligation to have your fingerprint taken if you are charge with a summary offence, but your fingerprint will be taken if your are charge with an hybrid offence, even if the prosecutor opted for summary conviction.
Depends on the offence. If it was a tiny offence then yes. If the offence was murder or kidnapping, then no