0
It hasn't been achieved yet, and it seems doubtful that it is possible. You may want to read the Wikipedia article on cold fusion to get a more detailed overview.
To summarize it: the muon-catalyzed kind definitely is possible and is routinely done by researchers in the field - the problem is that it requires more energy to generate the muons than you can get out of the fusion. The Fleischmann and Pons kind appears to have been poor laboratory technique (I'm being charitable here, and not suggesting that it was deliberate fraud).
Yes, sustained nuclear fusion is theoretically possible, as it is the same process that powers the sun. However, achieving controlled fusion reactions here on Earth for energy production is still a significant technical challenge. Researchers are working on developing fusion reactors that can sustain these reactions under controlled conditions.
The depends on what is meant by cold fusion. Cold fusion is nuclear fusion at low temperature, possibly room temperature, and this has been achieved. Cold fusion is sometimes spoken of as a way to produce power from nuclear fusion, and this has not been achieved, as far as we know.
The Fleischman-Pons experiments, which were regarded as promising for power production, could not be replicated, and are widely regarded as being an example of experimenters being misled by false results.
Cold fusion has been achieved in at least one other system, but not in a way that has practical value for energy production. Muon-catalyzed fusion has been shown to work with different sorts of apparatus, but it takes more energy to accomplish than it uses.
There have been confidence scams associated with cold fusion. Anyone considering investing in cold fusion should be cautious.
No, cold fussion is not real. There has never been a credible experiment to produce cold fusion. Several scientists have said that they created it, but have never been able to repeat their results (as needed in a good scientific experiments).
On Earth, not right now. We don't have to technological capability to sustain a controlled nuclear fusion reaction. The only place this is presently possible is within the core of the Sun and stars. Barring some stupendous discovery, we probably won't be able to do this for at least another 50 or 100 years. We are working on it, though.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can planets generate nuclear fusion?
Planets do not naturally generate nuclear fusion. Nuclear fusion occurs in stars, where the extreme heat and pressure at the core allows hydrogen nuclei to merge and form helium, releasing energy in the process. Planets lack the conditions necessary for sustained nuclear fusion reactions.
What are the costs of nuclear fusion energy?
The costs of nuclear fusion energy are currently high due to the complexity and advanced technology required for fusion reactions. Research and development costs are significant, as well as costs associated with building and maintaining fusion reactors. However, advancements in technology and increased investment in fusion energy could help lower costs in the future.
How do nuclear fusion differ fundamentally from nuclear fission?
Nuclear fusion doesn't produce energy.
Which do you currently use nuclear fusion or fission?
I currently use nuclear fusion.
Where does nuclear fusion occur in a nuclear plant?
Nuclear fusion does not currently occur in nuclear plants. Nuclear plants use nuclear fission, where atoms are split to release energy. Fusion reactions, in which atomic nuclei combine to release energy, are not yet used commercially for electricity generation.
Is it possible to create nuclear fusion in a particle accelerator?
Yes, it is possible (beam target fusion).
Can planets generate nuclear fusion?
Planets do not naturally generate nuclear fusion. Nuclear fusion occurs in stars, where the extreme heat and pressure at the core allows hydrogen nuclei to merge and form helium, releasing energy in the process. Planets lack the conditions necessary for sustained nuclear fusion reactions.
Does nuclear fusion occur?
Nuclear fusion occurs at the core of the sun (and other stars) providing huge amount of energy to the rest of the solar system. It has also been achieved on Earth, though not in a controlled and sustained manner.
What percent of the US' energy does nuclear fusion supply?
The nuclear fusion is not used now as a source of energy; probable possible in a far future.
How is nuclear generation similar to nuclear fusion?
There is very little similarity between present day power plants which use nuclear fission, and any possible nuclear fusion plant of the future
What are the costs of nuclear fusion energy?
The costs of nuclear fusion energy are currently high due to the complexity and advanced technology required for fusion reactions. Research and development costs are significant, as well as costs associated with building and maintaining fusion reactors. However, advancements in technology and increased investment in fusion energy could help lower costs in the future.
What process produces the largest amount of energy given off by stars?
Nuclear Fusion
How expensive is nuclear fusion?
At this time:in a bomb, very cheapin a reactor, not yet possible
What are the top smallest stars in the Milky Way?
The very smallest "stars" in the galaxy are brown dwarfs. These are starlike objects that have failed to produce sustained nuclear fusion.
Is fusion chemical nuclear or mechanical?
Fusion is a nuclear reaction.
Is fusion nuclear energy or chemical energy?
Nuclear fusion produces nuclear energy
What causes lesser pollution - nuclear fission or fusion?
Nuclear fusion
