0
I assisted Dr Foster with the Jefferson-Hemings DNA Study and can report that the test did disprove the original claim by James Callender in 1802. There was no Jefferson-Tom Woodson match whatsoever.
It did prove that the Carr brothers were not a match with the Hemings descendant of Eston Hemings, only son of Sally Hemings. The Hemings refuse to DNA test William Hemings (son of Madison Hemings) because they "are happy with the current results." I believe him to be fathered by one of the Carr brothers.
The Eston Hemings family always claimed descent from "a Jefferson uncle or nephew", meaning Randolph Jefferson, much younger brother of Thomas Jefferson, and his sons, not from Thomas. Dr Foster failed to notify Nature of these other family members with the same DNA; thus a false headline.
Herbert Barger, Founder, Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society
Another viewpoint:
The historical question of whether Jefferson was the father of Heming's children has been known as the Jefferson-Hemings controversy. Following renewed historic analysis and a 1998 DNA study that found a match between the Jefferson male line and a descendant of her last son, Eston Hemings, a consensus among historians supports that the widower Jefferson fathered her son Eston Hemings and likely all her children. Some historians disagree.
Neither of these answer the original question but it appears that DNA evidence was very important.
DNA evidence played a crucial role in the Jefferson-Hemings scandal, as it confirmed the genetic relationship between Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings' descendants. This evidence provided strong support for the long-standing historical accounts of their relationship, shedding new light on the complexities of American history and the institution of slavery.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?
Yes, DNA fingerprinting is a powerful tool for solving crimes because it can definitively link a suspect to a crime scene or victim. DNA evidence is scientifically reliable and has high accuracy, which can help prosecutors secure convictions or help exonerate innocent suspects. However, it is important to consider the chain of custody and proper handling of DNA samples to ensure the integrity of the evidence.
Why was it difficult to use DNA as evidence in a crime pcr was invented?
you need many copies of DNA for DNA fingerprinting
Are there any downsides to DNA evidence?
While DNA evidence is powerful in identifying suspects and solving crimes, there are potential downsides. These may include human error in sample collection or processing, the possibility of contamination leading to false results, privacy concerns related to storing genetic information, and the potential for misuse in cases of bias or misinterpretation.
What factors affect DNA evidence?
Several factors can affect the reliability of DNA evidence, including sample quality, contamination, degradation, mixtures of DNA from multiple individuals, and potential human error during collection and analysis. It is crucial for forensic scientists to carefully consider these factors when interpreting DNA evidence in criminal investigations.
Why is DNA evidence difficult to refute in court?
DNA evidence is difficult to refute in court because it is highly accurate and reliable. The technology used to analyze DNA is advanced and has a low margin of error, making it a strong piece of evidence. Additionally, DNA profiles are unique to each individual, making it highly improbable for someone else to have the exact same DNA profile.
Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?
Yes, DNA fingerprinting is a powerful tool for solving crimes because it can definitively link a suspect to a crime scene or victim. DNA evidence is scientifically reliable and has high accuracy, which can help prosecutors secure convictions or help exonerate innocent suspects. However, it is important to consider the chain of custody and proper handling of DNA samples to ensure the integrity of the evidence.
What are the arguments for and against DNA evidence?
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
What helps to solve crimes because no two people have the same DNA except identical twins?
DNA analysis is a powerful tool in solving crimes because each person's DNA is unique, except for identical twins who share the same DNA. By comparing DNA evidence found at a crime scene to that of a suspect or a database, forensic analysts can link individuals to the scene and provide important evidence in legal proceedings.
Can DNA evidence be washed away?
There are a few types of DNA. Some of them such as blood can be washed away. This is why its important that if someone is attacked they should go to the hospital before taking a shower. Some such as the DNA in your hair cannot be washed away.
What is the biochemical evidence that supports evolution?
DNA
Is sasquatch fake?
DNA evidence says they are not.
Which of the following is not a type of latent evidence?
dna
Why was it difficult to use DNA as evidence in a crime pcr was invented?
you need many copies of DNA for DNA fingerprinting
What evidence can be used for DNA fingerprinting at a crime scene?
DNA evidence from blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids found at the crime scene can be used for DNA fingerprinting. This evidence is compared to the DNA profiles of suspects to determine if a match exists, helping to identify or exclude individuals involved in the crime.
Why was it difficult to used DNA as evidence in a crime before PCR was invented?
you need many copies of DNA for DNA fingerprinting
Why was it difficult to use DNA as evidence in a crime before PCR was inventes?
you need many copies of DNA for DNA fingerprinting
How is DNA used for horse-meat scandal?
To determine if a certain meat really is horse meat or something else.
