The three patterns of natural selection are directional selection, stabilizing selection, and disruptive selection. Directional selection favors individuals at one extreme of a trait distribution, stabilizing selection favors the intermediate phenotype, and disruptive selection favors individuals at both extremes of a trait distribution.
Directional selection favors individuals with extreme phenotypes, leading to a shift in the population's characteristics over time. Stabilizing selection favors intermediate phenotypes, reducing variation within the population. Directional selection tends to decrease diversity by favoring extreme phenotypes, while stabilizing selection tends to maintain diversity by favoring intermediate phenotypes.
Industrial melanism is an example of directional selection, not stabilizing selection. In this phenomenon, environmental changes such as pollution cause a shift in the frequency of dark-colored individuals within a population, which increases their survival rates due to camouflage. Stabilizing selection, on the other hand, favors the intermediate phenotype, reducing the variation in a population.
Stabilizing selection favors the average phenotype and reduces genetic diversity by selecting against extreme traits. Directional selection favors individuals at one extreme of the phenotypic range, leading to a shift in the population's average phenotype. Disruptive selection favors individuals at both extremes of the phenotypic range, increasing genetic diversity within the population.
Stabilizing selection is the type of natural selection that acts against extreme forms of a polygenic trait to reduce genetic variation and maintains the average value of the trait within a population. It favors the intermediate phenotype, leading to a narrowing of the range of variation for that trait over time.
The three patterns of natural selection are directional selection, stabilizing selection, and disruptive selection. Directional selection favors individuals at one extreme of a trait distribution, stabilizing selection favors the intermediate phenotype, and disruptive selection favors individuals at both extremes of a trait distribution.
They both decrease genetic variation .
They both decrease genetic variation .
Directional selection favors individuals with extreme phenotypes, leading to a shift in the population's characteristics over time. Stabilizing selection favors intermediate phenotypes, reducing variation within the population. Directional selection tends to decrease diversity by favoring extreme phenotypes, while stabilizing selection tends to maintain diversity by favoring intermediate phenotypes.
Directional selection
stabilizing selection
I'm not sure what "stabilizing directional" selection is, but if you get out a bell curve graph... Stabilizing selection tends to select for individuals around the average, or mean, of a population, which technically makes the curve steeper. Directional selection shifts the average in one direction (shifts the whole curve in one direction). Disruptive selection creates two new averages, which means it splits the one curve into two, smaller, separate curves.
Industrial melanism is an example of directional selection, not stabilizing selection. In this phenomenon, environmental changes such as pollution cause a shift in the frequency of dark-colored individuals within a population, which increases their survival rates due to camouflage. Stabilizing selection, on the other hand, favors the intermediate phenotype, reducing the variation in a population.
Stabilizing Selection-- The extremes are selected against.Example: height; mostly beings tend to the average height- not too many really short ones or really tall ones.Directional selection-- One extreme value is selected for.Example: speed; faster is always better so a population will tend to get faster over time.Disruptive selection-- The extremes are both selected for.This type of selection is not as common as the first two. Example: Prey-type animal with distinctive markings which the predators know will over time move away from the norm in both directions.
Disruptive selectionNatural selection . Stabilizing selection. Directional selectionthe answer is one of these idk which one
When natural selection favors the intermediate version of a characteristic, it is referred to as stabilizing selection. It is the opposite of disruptive selection.
Stabilizing selection favors the average phenotype and reduces genetic diversity by selecting against extreme traits. Directional selection favors individuals at one extreme of the phenotypic range, leading to a shift in the population's average phenotype. Disruptive selection favors individuals at both extremes of the phenotypic range, increasing genetic diversity within the population.