No, unfortunately, it's the other way round. The use of energy sources from the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) in industry, transport and the generation of electricity, releases carbon dioxide. This is one of the greenhouse gases that is contributing to global warming, not global cooling.
Not any more. There was a time in the mid-20th century when burning fossil fuel, particularly coal, put so much dust and particulate matter into the atmosphere that it reflected some of the heat from the sun, reducing the effects of global warming. Clean Air acts later made the atmosphere clean again and global cooling disappeared.
Simple: turn around 360 degrees all the while casting Your Vision axially Outward and You will not see any area of [inner] Space that is not being blasted by CO2 emitting 'power?' plants.
The eruption of Krakatoa in 1883 led to a period of global cooling due to the injection of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, which blocked sunlight and lowered temperatures. This cooling may have influenced the cryosphere by contributing to a temporary increase in glacier growth or extent.
The opposite of global warming is global cooling, which refers to a decrease in the Earth's average temperature over an extended period of time.
No there is not. Climate change/global warming or cooling is a natural phenomena. We may be able to reduce the rate of change by sensible use of energy.
Yes, the heat for global warming comes initially from the sun.
Not any more. There was a time in the mid-20th century when burning fossil fuel, particularly coal, put so much dust and particulate matter into the atmosphere that it reflected some of the heat from the sun, reducing the effects of global warming. Clean Air acts later made the atmosphere clean again and global cooling disappeared.
That we will be simply wasting the energy without use and might contributing for global warming.
Because it does not cause pollution by producing greenhouse gases and contributing to global warming
Solar energy is virtually unlimited. Overuse of limited resources of fossil fuels (coal, oil, etc.) is not responsible because we could run out, or our descendants will run out sooner than if we limit our use of those resources. Burning these fuels is also contributing to global warming.
Simple: turn around 360 degrees all the while casting Your Vision axially Outward and You will not see any area of [inner] Space that is not being blasted by CO2 emitting 'power?' plants.
Once installed it is free, as solar energy is renewable.It emits no polluting greenhouse gases, so it is not contributing to global warming.
The reverse change of global warming is global cooling, which refers to a decrease in average temperatures worldwide. Global freezing is not a recognized scientific term but can be used colloquially to emphasize extreme cold conditions.
We use energy most for transportation, electricity generation, and heating/cooling buildings. These sectors account for the majority of global energy consumption.
The eruption of Krakatoa in 1883 led to a period of global cooling due to the injection of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, which blocked sunlight and lowered temperatures. This cooling may have influenced the cryosphere by contributing to a temporary increase in glacier growth or extent.
The opposite of global warming is global cooling, which refers to a decrease in the Earth's average temperature over an extended period of time.
No there is not. Climate change/global warming or cooling is a natural phenomena. We may be able to reduce the rate of change by sensible use of energy.