0
No, unfortunately, it's the other way round. The use of energy sources from the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) in industry, transport and the generation of electricity, releases carbon dioxide. This is one of the greenhouse gases that is contributing to global warming, not global cooling.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Lao
Blake
DevinAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Do energy resources contribute to global cooling?
Not any more. There was a time in the mid-20th century when burning fossil fuel, particularly coal, put so much dust and particulate matter into the atmosphere that it reflected some of the heat from the sun, reducing the effects of global warming. Clean Air acts later made the atmosphere clean again and global cooling disappeared.
How do you think energy resources are contributing to Global Warming?
Simple: turn around 360 degrees all the while casting Your Vision axially Outward and You will not see any area of [inner] Space that is not being blasted by CO2 emitting 'power?' plants.
How did Krakatoa affect cryosphere?
The eruption of Krakatoa in 1883 led to a period of global cooling due to the injection of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, which blocked sunlight and lowered temperatures. This cooling may have influenced the cryosphere by contributing to a temporary increase in glacier growth or extent.
What is the opposite of global warming?
The opposite of global warming is global cooling, which refers to a decrease in the Earth's average temperature over an extended period of time.
Is there any ways that the world can stop global warming?
No there is not. Climate change/global warming or cooling is a natural phenomena. We may be able to reduce the rate of change by sensible use of energy.
