The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The mass of a planet has nothing to do with its number of moons. For instance, Mars' mass is much less than that of Earth, yet Mars has two moons (Deimos and Phobos) while the Earth has one. (Luna)
There is no direct connection between the mass of a planet and the number of moons it has. Mars is less massive than Earth but has twice as many moons as does Earth. Jupiter is more massive than either Mars of Earth and has many more moons that either of them.
In our solar system, at least, the planet with the greatest mass does happen to be the one with the most known moons. But I think the cause and effect work the other way. It's not the moons that give the planet strong gravity. It's the strong gravity of the planet that captures a bunch of moons.
None in reality - BUT the probability of having moons goes up as mass of the central planet rises.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The mass of a planet has nothing to do with its number of moons. For instance, Mars' mass is much less than that of Earth, yet Mars has two moons (Deimos and Phobos) while the Earth has one. (Luna)
There is no direct connection between the mass of a planet and the number of moons it has. Mars is less massive than Earth but has twice as many moons as does Earth. Jupiter is more massive than either Mars of Earth and has many more moons that either of them.
There is no direct connection between the mass of a planet and the number of moons it has. Mars is less massive than Earth but has twice as many moons as does Earth. Jupiter is more massive than either Mars of Earth and has many more moons that either of them.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.