An element's atomic mass does not include the mass of its electrons. Electrons have such a small mass compared to protons and neutrons that they are not typically included in calculations of atomic mass.
Neutrons do not have any charge but have mass, whereas electrons have a negative charge and negligible mass. However, there is no known substance that specifically has electrons without protons.
The mass of electrons is not excluded from atomic mass. The mass number of an isotope of an element excludes electrons because it is the sum of protons and neutrons.From Wikipedia, "The atomic mass (ma) is the mass of a specific isotope, most often expressed in unified atomic mass units. The atomic mass is the total mass of protons, neutrons and electrons in a single atom."
You're probably thinking of electrons, whose mass is much smaller than nucleons but also have a negative charge. Indeed, the electron has the smallest amount of mass of any particle with a negative charge.
Electrons are very light. Protons are approx. 1800 X the mass (rest mass to be presice). Neutrons are about the same mass a protons. So the mass of all the electrons has little effect.
The mass of any atom is in the nucleus because it contains both protons and neutrons. Protons and neutrons have a significantly greater mass than electrons do, so electrons are ignored when finding the mass of an atom.
About 1837.This is why you can safely ignore the mass of electrons for any known element in rough calculations; the total mass of the electrons will be well under 0.1 amu.
No, electron count really doesn't have anything much to do with atomic mass. Let's look. Most of the mass of any atom is concentrated in the nucleus. It's the protons and neutrons there that give the atom "weight" and the electrons contribute almost nothing. Additionally, electrons can be loaned or borrowed by atoms, and this changes their mass very little. The number of electrons is not very "connected" to atomic mass of an atom.
no of electrons in any atom is equal to the atomic number of that element so no of electron is 80
electrons have no mass
You're probably thinking of electrons, whose mass is much smaller than nucleons but also have a negative charge. Indeed, the electron has the smallest amount of mass of any particle with a negative charge.
Electrons are very light. Protons are approx. 1800 X the mass (rest mass to be presice). Neutrons are about the same mass a protons. So the mass of all the electrons has little effect.
no electrons have mass, about 1/1800 that of a proton or neutron.
The mass of 5.1018 electrons is 45,546 910 75.10-13 kg.
Any neutral atoms has the same number of electrons as protons, and any atom has a number of protons equal to the difference between its mass number and neutron number. Therefore, this atom has 197 - 118 = 79 electrons.
It is nothing but the total no of protons and electrons .So it is found by summing the total no protons and electrons present in an atom It is not electrons but the total of neutrons and protons present in the nucleus of any atom.
Electrons having mass is essential for understanding their behavior in the realm of particle physics. Mass affects various interactions of electrons, such as their ability to couple with the Higgs field to acquire mass or participate in the weak force interactions. Without mass, electrons would not be able to form stable atoms, and the entire foundation of chemistry and matter as we know it would be fundamentally different.