The short answer:
No.
The long answer:
The fastest manned vehicle record is held by a rocket, the Saturn V, on its return to Earth at the end of the Apollo 10 mission, achieving nearly 40,000 kph (just shy of 25,000 mph).
The (un-manned) New Horizons space craft is currently travelling at just under 55,500 kph (34,500 mph) en-route to Pluto.
The Voyager 1 probe was doing about 61,000 kph (38,000 mph) when it left the solar system. Both Voyager probes are still making their way through the Heliosheaf, and are still sending data back to Earth.
The fastest man-made object is the Helios 2 (solar observation) probe at 252,800 kph (157,100 mph). Helios 1 and 2 are no longer functioning, but are still orbiting the sun.
The speed of light (in a vacuum) is 1,079,252,850 kph (670,616,630 mph), which is, to put it mildly, rather a large gap.
Abandoning chemical rockets for advancing ion-based propulsion systems and solar sails, we may produce craft that greatly exceed all current speed records through the application of constant force over time. While they could take many years to achieve maximum speed, they would be capable of maintaining thrust for prolonged periods.
Even with all the time in the universe, there are other obstructions, however. The laws of physics, thus far in accordance with all predictions based upon Einstein's theory of relativity, dictate that as an object with mass approaches the speed of light, its mass will become infinite. The energy required to accelerate the object to light speed would be infinite. Even stranger, the length of the object or craft would become zero. These are impossibilities.
Knowing quite what happens at such velocities is something that we continue to strive for, and so far, everything that can be measured, whether it be the distance and velocity of astronomical objects, or readings taken of particles travelling at near-relativistic speeds in an accelerator, conforms to predictions using Einstein's theory.
At the very least, we can assume with some certainty that travelling at the speed of light would mean having to bend the physical laws of the universe in some weird ways. We have no idea if or how such laws can be bent, and we're certainly not going to achieve even near-light speeds with conventional rockets any time soon.
No, according to the theory of relativity, it is impossible for any particle with mass to reach or exceed the speed of light. Accelerators can increase the speed of particles to high fractions of the speed of light, but they cannot exceed it.
1.27 seconds
It is not possible for a particle with mass to reach the speed of light, as it would require infinite energy. Additionally, at speeds approaching the speed of light, relativistic effects become significant, causing time dilation and length contraction.
It would take approximately 40 years to reach the star Vega, which is about 25 light-years away from Earth, if a spaceship could travel at one-tenth the speed of light.
No - you would be stopped BEFORE you reach the speed of light, by your increasing mass (among other things). As your speed approaches the speed of light, your mass would approach infinity, and it would require an infinite energy to actually achieve the speed of light.Note that the "speed of light" is not really about light. It is a speed limit of our Universe; some have described it as the "speed of causality".
None can.
the light speed are very fast so light easily reach on earth
Neither, mass can never reach the speed of light, this question also contridicts the theory of realativity.
You can't travel at the speed of light. It might be possible, in theory, to approach it, but not quite to reach it.
No, according to the theory of relativity, it is impossible for any particle with mass to reach or exceed the speed of light. Accelerators can increase the speed of particles to high fractions of the speed of light, but they cannot exceed it.
Electrons do not typically move at the speed of light, as they have mass and are subject to physical constraints. In a vacuum, light travels at approximately 299,792,458 meters per second, whereas the speed of electrons in electrical circuits is much slower, typically on the order of millimeters per second.
The upper limit to the speed of an object with mass is the speed of light in a vacuum, which is approximately 299,792 kilometers per second (186,282 miles per second). According to Einstein's theory of relativity, as an object with mass approaches the speed of light, its energy and momentum increase towards infinity, making it impossible to accelerate to or exceed the speed of light.
It would never reach the speed of light because things with mass can't move at the speed of light. However, it would eventually get as close to the speed of light as you want.
No such thing would happen. Matter cannot reach the speed of light, only massless things can (and they cannot travel at any other speed than the speed of light).
1.27 seconds
Since no object with mass can reach the speed of light -- such an object can only approach that speed -- the question is meaningless.
from a purely mathematical stand point, if something were to reach the speed of light the time dialation/length contraction formula would yield something over 0. This is beacuse the formula is: constant/[(1-(velocity/speed of light)^2] as you can see, if velocity=speed of light, you get something over zero.