The ticket follows the car; the car follows the registration; the registered owner is liable for any tickets. However, if you can prove someone else committed the violation, you can take them to small claims court and get a judgment against them. But you must still pay the tickets.
Unfortunitly you are in control of your actions. If any employer is requesting you to break the law, then you should make your own decision and leave that company or advise your employer that you will not be driving if that is there decision. You will be held accountable for your actions and your employer is not held liable. Unless you can prove that he had physically pushed your foot against the accelerator there is nothing that can be done.
Talk to an attorney. A diagnosis does not immediately make someone else liable.
A legal concept that separates the personality of a corporation from the personalities of its shareholders, and protects them from being personally liable for the company's debts and other obligations. This protection is not ironclad or impenetrable. Where a court determines that a company's business was not conducted in accordance with the provisions of corporate legislation (or that it was just a facade for illegal activities) it may hold the shareholders personally liable for the company's obligations under the legal concept of lifting the corporate veil.
Yes, they are. The cities that install them do not do this without considering the legal possibilities. They usually include a picture of the front and back of the car, and often the driver is visible. Do not speed if you do not want a ticket. The prior answer is not entirely true. You must look into what constitutes legal service in your state. For example, in Arizona, a ticket issued only by mail does not constitute liable legal service, and according to state statute rule 4i, such a thing is dismissed after 120 days. Yes it is legal to ISSUE the ticket, but as far as the legal liability involved, that is questionable depending on location.
No. A cosigner's only obligation is the debt incurred by signing the lending agreement.
When you cosign for an automobile purchase you are typically liable for an automobile repossession in Michigan. The reason why is because you are responsible for car payments as a cosigner if the primary debtor cannot pay.
Yes, the cosigner is typically liable for the vehicle if the primary borrower defaults and the vehicle is repossessed. The cosigner is equally responsible for the loan and may be pursued for any outstanding debts, fees, or deficiencies resulting from the repossession. It's important for cosigners to understand their obligations before agreeing to cosign a loan.
No, an insurance company does not get notified of a parking tickets. Insurance companies are only liable for handling accidents.
No, the primary signer is still liable. But if a loan is not dischargeable, such as a student loan (actually is is extremely hard to discharge), both the primary and co-signer will STILL be liable after the bankruptcy
Yes. That is the whole purpose of having a co-signer. They are liable for repaying the loan if the primary borrower defaults.
No, a co signor would not be liable. A co-buyer would be liable.
Liable for what? A parking ticket? Not if it isn't your car.
It depends on the policy of the finance company. I used to work in the auto finance business, and the companies that I worked for would not do it because there was no reason to. Technically speaking, the co-signer is fully liable for the loan, just like the primary signer, so whose name appeared first on the contract had nothing to do with anything.
A cosigner is only needed because the primary doesn't have adequate credit rating/history for the needed loan. Hence, the cosigner needs to have credit good enough to qualify for the loan, presumably good, at least betterr than the primary! (Credit scores are not combined or added to get to the needed level). Understand, being a cosigner is essentially the exact same as getting a loan - the cosigner is just as liable as if he got the loan on his own..in fact needs to be more responsible, because he now has to take on the obligations of the primary too, if needed, likely without the control/posession/benefit of what was purchased.
You will also be liable for any deficiency balance
. Generally, no. A co-signer on a loan does not have to reside at the same residence as the primary borrower. Once the co-signer signs for the primary borrower; he or she is as liable as the primary borrower. It should be noted that some lenders may have their own requirement that the co-signer live at the same address as the primary borrower.