answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

By becoming a naval power to match the Carthaginians, by developing superior land power, and by establishing allies.

Rome had already established allies when she expanded into Italy before the three Punic Wars with Carthage. She had forced the peoples she had defeated into military alliances in which they had to provide soldiers for the Romans at their own expense. This had boosted Rome's military power long before the mentioned wars.

In the Frist Punic war Rome, first the first time, built a large military fleet which matched the Carthaginian one in size, but not in quality of shipbuilding and skills of the rowers. Carthage and their Phoenician motherland had been a major naval power (both merchant and military) for a long time and their shipbuilding and naval skills were second to none. The Romans were inexperienced. What made the final difference was that when both the Carthaginian and Roman states were financially exhausted and could not afford a new fleet, rich Roman citizens paid for a new fleet. This fleet won the last naval battle and destroyed the last Carthaginian fleet. Rome had control of the sea and Carthage had to sue for peace.

In the Second Punic War the land power of Hannibal, the Carthaginian general, was actually far superior to that of the Romans. He fought a campaign in Italy and utterly routed the Roman armies in a number of battles, causing the death of hundreds of thousands of Roman and allied soldiers. What tipped the balance in favour of Rome were four main factors:

1) The Romans adopted a strategy of attrition which involved avoiding open battle and trying to wear Hannibal down by harassing his through guerrilla tactics. This caused Hannibal's war effort to get bogged down in southern Italy, far from Rome.

2) Hannibal had lost his siege machines when he crossed the Alps to reach Italy. Without this he could not attack Rome. His brother Hasdrubal tried to bring siege machines and reinforcements from Spain, but he was intercepted and his army was routed before he linked up with Hannibal. Not receiving the siege machines was the beginning of the end for Hannibal.

3) At this point the Carthaginian senate refused to support Hannibal and to send him supplies or reinforcements. Many people in Carthage were against the war.

4) The Romans found in Scipio Africanus a general who could match Hannibal's military genius. He defeated the Carthaginians in Spain in the battle of Ilipa. Spain fell under the Romans, depriving the Carthaginians with their main source of wealth (from silver mines) and with the supply of the bulk of their soldiers (who were recruited in Spain) and meant that Hannibal could not receive help from Spain. Scipio Africanus then landed in Africa to attack Carthage and defeated Hannibal in the battle of Zama.

In the Third Punic War Rome declared war to destroy Carthage. Carthage had been demilitarised under the terms of the peace treaty. When Carthage finished to pay the war indemnities after 50 years, she considered herself free from the treaty and raised an army to fight the raids by the neighbouring Numidian kingdom. Rome was worried about a resurgence of Carthaginian military power. It was easy for Rome to defeat and destroy Carthage because she had lost all her possessions in the western Mediterranean and she was confined to her original lands in northern Tunisia

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

They were well-led and hired th best mercenaries to fight for them.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

They fought three wars over a 120 year period and lost all three.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

They ambushed the Roman force which was not properly deployed for battle.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why were the Carthaginians so successful in battle?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Predict why the carthaginians were so successful during this campaign?

Which campaign.


What the battle where Scipio's troops defeated the Carthaginians?

The Battle of Zama .


Who was defeated at the battle of zama?

Hannibal and the Carthaginians were defeated at the battle of Zama.


Who were the key players in the battle of Carthage?

The Romans and the Carthaginians.


Who won the battle of cannae?

The Carthaginians, led by Hannibal, won the Battle of Cannae in 216 BC. The Carthaginians used a successful double envelopment strategy which resulted in a devastating defeat for the Roman army. It is considered one of the greatest tactical victories in military history.


What were the two enemies that the ancient Romans did not battle?

Etruscans Carthaginians


Who defeated the carthaginians?

The Roman general Scipio defeated the Carthaginians under Hannibal at the battle of Zama in Africa. Scipio was awarded the honorific name Africanus for his victory.


How many roman soldiers were in the battle of Trebia?

Over 100,000 Roman's fought in the Battle of the River Trebia and roughly 50,000 of them were killed by the Carthaginians.


Where did the Battle of Zama take place?

The Carthaginians defending their city against Roman attack.


Were there any barriers that soldiers had to overcome in the Zama battle?

The Roman army had to deal with war elephants used by the Carthaginians.


Who lead the punic wars?

For the Carthaginians , Hamilcar , Hasdrubal and Hannibal Barca . The Romans had a series of commanders , many who had come to grief (Battle of the Trebia/Tiberius Sempronius Longus , Battle of Lake Trasimene/Gaius Flaminius Nepos and Battle of Cannae/ Gaius Terentius Varro/Lucius Aemilius Paullus) , Publius Cornelius Scipio being the most successful . ~ See related link below .


Which tactics were successful and which were not in the battle of fort Sumter?

which tactics were successful and which and were not in battle of fort sumter