They become enemies since the juror number three disagrees with number eights evidence. Most jurors believe supported evidence by juror number eight as for number three suggests to stick to the facts, and forms an nemisis relationship.
Juror 5 gets mad after the second vote, when Juror 3 accuses him of being soft and changing his vote. It turns out Juror 9 (the old man) was the one to change his vote.
The first time it was at the beginning of the play and Juror #8 is the only one to raise his hand to vote "not guilty".The second time it was after they saw the knife and it was a secret ballot. Juror #8 said he was not going to vote and if there were 11 "guilty"s then Juror 8 would change his vote, but Juror 9 voted "not guilty".The third time was after Juror 8 reenacted the old man's walk down the hall and Juror #3's and Juror #8's little tussle. Jurors 2,5,6,11 vote "not guilty".The fourth time was after the knife scene and Juror #7 changes his vote because he was "sick of this whole thing". During this vote Jurors 1 and 12 change to "not guilty".The fifth time wasn't really a formal vote and it was after they demonstrated that the lady couldn't see without her glasses. Juror #8 asks "does anyone think there still is not a reasonable doubt?" and no on said anything except for Juror #3.The end of the play was when Juror #3 changed his vote.So 5 times.
Henry Fonda
Juror #1o agrees with juror #12 and changes his vote to Not Guilty without any hoopla attached. You may have the number wrong for the juror you are attributing the quote to.
The 12th juror in the play 12 Angry Men originally believes that the boy is guilty. He later changes his vote to not guilty following the deliberation.
Juror 9, played by Joseph Sweeney, was the oldest juror in "Twelve Angry Men." He was the wise and observant member who contributed valuable insights during the deliberations.
They become enemies since the juror number three disagrees with number eights evidence. Most jurors believe supported evidence by juror number eight as for number three suggests to stick to the facts, and forms an nemisis relationship.
The protagonist in "12 Angry Men" is Juror 8, played by Henry Fonda, who is the dissenting juror seeking to convince the others of reasonable doubt. The antagonist could be considered as Juror 3, played by Lee J. Cobb, who at first strongly believes in the defendant's guilt and serves as the main opposing force to Juror 8's arguments.
His normal job is not specified, although he did have a job as a juror.
Juror #7 had tickets to see the Yankees play Cleveland.
Juror Eight is the protagonist in Twelve Angry Men.
Juror 5 gets mad after the second vote, when Juror 3 accuses him of being soft and changing his vote. It turns out Juror 9 (the old man) was the one to change his vote.
The first time it was at the beginning of the play and Juror #8 is the only one to raise his hand to vote "not guilty".The second time it was after they saw the knife and it was a secret ballot. Juror #8 said he was not going to vote and if there were 11 "guilty"s then Juror 8 would change his vote, but Juror 9 voted "not guilty".The third time was after Juror 8 reenacted the old man's walk down the hall and Juror #3's and Juror #8's little tussle. Jurors 2,5,6,11 vote "not guilty".The fourth time was after the knife scene and Juror #7 changes his vote because he was "sick of this whole thing". During this vote Jurors 1 and 12 change to "not guilty".The fifth time wasn't really a formal vote and it was after they demonstrated that the lady couldn't see without her glasses. Juror #8 asks "does anyone think there still is not a reasonable doubt?" and no on said anything except for Juror #3.The end of the play was when Juror #3 changed his vote.So 5 times.
Henry Fonda & Jack Lemmon
Henry Fonda
Juror #1o agrees with juror #12 and changes his vote to Not Guilty without any hoopla attached. You may have the number wrong for the juror you are attributing the quote to.