Feudal Japanese and European societies were built on a system of hereditary classes
. The nobles were at the top, followed by warriors, with tenant farmers or serfs below. There was very little social mobility; the children of farmers became farmers, while the children of lords became lords and ladies. (One prominent exception to this rule in Japan was Toyotomi Hideyoshi
, born a farmer's son, who rose to rule over the country.) Also, i
n both feudal Japan and Europe, constant warfare made warriors the most important class. Called "knights
" in Europe and "samurai
" in Japan, the warriors served local lords. In both cases, the warriors were bound by a code of ethics. Knights were supposed to hew to the concept of
chivalry, while samurai were bound by the precepts ofbushido
, or "the Way of the Warrior."
They mean Ugly farts
Both were formed to protect democracy in other places.
the similarities are idk! if u want to know go to julianneska@gmail.com
They ah both govhenment syshtems ushed today biye diiferhnt countries
Two immediate similarities in my mind are that they both possess a bureaucracy to implement their rule and maintain police and/or military forces to control force.
No there is no connection between the concept of feudalism and democracy.
Democracy. In a democracy the people can change the government through non violent means. In feudalism there is one controlling power and the people are told what to do and how to live.
they just have different countries that is all different countries have different type of democracy you know.
monarchy
everything, libertarianism is democracy and democracy is libertarianism.
Well obviously Democracy is where everyone is even in society whether you're a man or woman, rich or poor. Democracy is where every citizen of that country should be able to have a say. Feudalism is basically a social hierarchy. There are levels of how much a person gets to have a say on things, depending on their financial status and gender. Here are some differences, I have listed them below. I really hope this helps! - Feudalism restrains the amount of how much a person gets a say on something depending on their financial status, whereas in a Democracy, everyone is given the same amount of how much they get a say in something. - Feudalism gives the ones at the bottom of the social hierarchy, a hard life. But, once again, in a Democracy, you can get supported so that you have as good as a life as everyone else. - Feudalism gives minimal freedom to people who aren't rich, Democracy allows everyone to have the same amount of freedom whether you're poor or rich. - Feudalism is not a good thing! Democracy is a way better way of society. - Feudalism is not very commonly used in societies and countries today. A Democracy system is mostly used around the majority of places in the world. So these are only some differences, I hope this helps you! If this answer helped you, please help me and click 'recommend' and make me a recommended answerer! Thanks (:
A: They both are a type of democracy. The people also elect their government leaders, and a presidential democracy is ruled by a president and a parliamentary democracy is ruled by a prime minister. -BrockChloe
There are elections.
Democracy
Feudalism
slavery
they both do stuff