0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the definition of relative power?
Relative power, as opposed to absolute power, is the perveived amount of power one person or entity has in relation to another person or entity. Its a term applied to international relations theory. Some Scholars argue that states compete for relative power while others argue that states compete for absolute power. It is my belief that states are primarily concerned with relative power, that is, how much power a particular state has in relation to another.
What is a person with absolute power called?
Omnipotent,All-Powerfulare a few words which represents unlimited power.
What are the differences of the time sharing and multiprogramming?
Time-sharing is an approach to interactive computing in which a single computer is used to provide apparently simultaneous interactive general-purpose computing to multiple users by sharing processor time. So basically, time sharing is for multi-user computer systems. Multiprogramming is A form of processing in which a computer holds more than one program in memory and works on them in round-robin fashion that is, by sharing out the processor's time so that each program receives some attention some of the time. This way of working is in contrast to using the processor to run one program at a time.
Does absolute motion only exist in outer space?
There is no such thing as "absolute motion" - neither in outer space, nor anywhere else. Motion must always be specified in relationship to some other object.
What are some possible key values present in the Canadian government and or society that underlie the Canadian economy?
Public good, cooperation, equity and sharing :3
Does the president have absolute power?
In some countries the president is actually a dictator, in these cases the president would have absolute power. It is not so in countries such as the USA or France for instance.
What are plenary power?
complete and absolute powers to perform some action
What are the difficulties of power sharing?
Difficulties of power sharing can include challenges in reaching consensus among different groups, potential for conflict over distribution of power, and concerns about the effectiveness and efficiency of decision-making processes. Additionally, power sharing may require compromises that can be difficult for some parties to accept, leading to tensions and resistance.
Should felons lose their absolute rights?
What is meant by "absolute rights?" But, generally, yes. Even after incarceration they should lose some rights. Felony offenses are SERIOUS crimes with serious, and real, consequences for innocent parties. The potential perpetrators HAVE TO weigh the possible consequences of their actions against how it may affect their future life. You just can't make the consequences go away by saying "I'm sorry," or requesting a "do over."
Why is power sharing not desirable?
Power sharing may not be desirable in certain situations because it can lead to delays in decision-making, conflicts of interest, and a lack of accountability. It may also result in inefficiency and difficulties in implementing policies effectively. Additionally, in some cases, power sharing can perpetuate the dominance of certain groups and hinder the representation of marginalized voices.
What is a government run the a king or queen?
A government run by a king or queen would be an absolute monarchy. Although, some nations, such as the United Kingdom, have a constitutional monarchy, where the queen does not have absolute power.
What is the definition of relative power?
Relative power, as opposed to absolute power, is the perveived amount of power one person or entity has in relation to another person or entity. Its a term applied to international relations theory. Some Scholars argue that states compete for relative power while others argue that states compete for absolute power. It is my belief that states are primarily concerned with relative power, that is, how much power a particular state has in relation to another.
What is a ruler who has absolute power over a country's government?
A dictatorE.g. Hitler was a dictator but was addressed as the fuhrerOther titles used for designating absolute power can be king, queen, tyrant, Caesar, chairman, president, lord, and chief. It cannot be emphasized enough that some titles of those with absolute power can be disguised, such as the title of president....Conversely, all people with absolute power, can in fact have this power "on paper" but in practice, absolute power is not always enforceable, as example der Fuhrer ordered certain German generals not to surrender and they did in fact do so. This happened in WW2 by German generals in Russia.Also, the Emperor of Japan ordered all Japanese soldiers to fight to the death in Iwo Jima, and this order was disobeyed.
What is the difference between constitutional monarchy and an absolute monarchy?
In a constitutional monarchy, like in England, the monarch does not have much power at all, because there is a constitution. In an absolute monarchy, they have absolute power. In a constitutional monarchy, the power of the monarch is limited by some set of rules or document (e.g. a constitution), which sets out the powers given to the monarch. Other powers are given to other groups, commonly judges and a legislature. How much power is given to each group and the monarch varies widely, and is entirely up to the constitution of the country in question. In an absolute monarchy, the monarch is presumed to be God-(or other deity)-ordained, and rules with no limits on their power.
Was Henry IV an absolute monarch?
he was absolute because he was able to remove the nobilty from power, therefore he was alone in the throne. Also he established and raised a military that was able to accomplish some of his desires.
What are the impact and consequences?
Everything has consequences. Possibly there is some specific item whose consequences you are asking about.
How did Absolute Monarchy start?
Monarchs through most of history had de jure absolute power, but because they could not usually extend their power effectively to the local level, their power did not make it to the local level without interlocutors like local lords, barons, dukes, viscounts, and counts who were able to exert some power in contrast. By the early 1600s, though, technology made it increasingly easier to centralize government work, making the de jure absolute power become de facto absolute power as well. This is usually seen as the beginning of absolutism as a political doctrine.
