The major subplot between Jack and Rose is entirely fictional. They have no more historical reality than say, Colonel Wilhelm Klink and Sergeant schultz of Hogan"s Heroes. There was, of course a Titanic disaster, but the Rose/Jack romance and its fatal consequences are all Hollywood. Some people felt the plot could have been altered ( retaining, of course the major ship accident,) so that both parties, Rose and Jack survived their ordeal. There would be no major problem in this as the tragic angles were already top-heavy pun intended.
yes there where a rose and jack on Titanic
Rose is a fictional character, not a real person it is a charter in the MOVIE the titanic
In the 1997 movie Titanic, Rose survives the sinking of the ship, yes. But Rose Dewitt Bukater is a fictional character. She is not a real person. So if you are asking whether the "real" Rose survived the Titanic, then the answer is that there is no real Rose.
No. Jack and Rose are fictional characters.
Rose was a fictional character, nor was she actually on the titanic. Rose is played by Kate Winslet in the movie. She was nude in the movie, but she was not on the titanic in 1912, so no.
yes there where a rose and jack on Titanic
Rose is a fictional character, not a real person it is a charter in the MOVIE the titanic
jack and rose were not on the real titanic.
No
In the 1997 movie Titanic, Rose survives the sinking of the ship, yes. But Rose Dewitt Bukater is a fictional character. She is not a real person. So if you are asking whether the "real" Rose survived the Titanic, then the answer is that there is no real Rose.
no
no...
rose Is not real!
She's fictional.
No. Jack and Rose are fictional characters.
Rose was a fictional character, nor was she actually on the titanic. Rose is played by Kate Winslet in the movie. She was nude in the movie, but she was not on the titanic in 1912, so no.
Both Jack and Rose were fictional characters created for the film Titanic, and did not actually exist.