All new ideas which upset the "current order" take a while to be accepted. The first expression of the heliocentric model of the solar system was by Aristarchus of Samos, 2400 years ago; it wasn't until Copernicus did his work that it became generally accepted.
Galileo and Newton in physics overturned Aristotle. The theory of plate tectonics and continental drift was generally laughed at when I was in school. (But now you learn it IN school.) Sir Fred Hoyle coined the term "big bang" in mockery, compared to the accepted "steady state" theory. Luis Alvarez was derided as an insane madman for coming up with the impossible notion that a city-sized rock falling from space might have killed off the dinosaurs, and that was only 50 years ago! Now we (think we) know better.
Every new idea goes through a weeding out process. Somebody makes a highly improbable assertion. Other scientists examine the idea, and try to come up with evidence for or against it. Somebody figures out a mechanism by which this might have happened. (Many "new ideas" disintegrate at these stages, and go no further. Not every "new idea" is true, and this weeding-out process is part of the "scientific method".)
W.E.B. Dubois opposed the ideas of Booker T. Washington because he thought Washington accepted segregation while promoting economic advancement. Dubois felt that discrimination should be tackled head on with direct confrontation.
The frame narrative in my opinion does not effectively separate Thomas More from the ideas of Utopia. It may be the period in which it was written in, but to me it's difficult to see the line between his real views and his "Utopian" views. For example, he persecuted the Protestants in reality, but in Utopia, religion is glitter and rainbows, and it makes it hard to comprehend his ideas.
The seeds are ideas, things to help you write.
Ideology is the pattern or cluster of ideas accepted by a political party or other voluntary group. Trade unionism is the preference among some workers for organizing or joining a union at their current employer. Union members need not share any ideology, they must just pay dues.
The Destruction of Small Ideas was created on 2007-04-30.
Nicolaus Copernicus's scientific ideas regarding the universe and specifically the idea of heliocentrism were at odds with the generally accepted ideas of his time. It was difficult for people to accept these new ideas, made even more difficult by the Catholic Church's powerful opposition to them for some time.
New ideas are never readily accepted.
Sigmund Freud's ideas were not universally accepted because they were controversial and challenged prevailing beliefs about human behavior and psychology. Additionally, his ideas were often difficult to test and confirm through empirical research. Freud's emphasis on unconscious processes, sexuality, and childhood experiences also clashed with the norms of his time, leading to skepticism and criticism from many in the scientific community.
Edwin A. Phillips has written: 'Basic ideas in biology' -- subject(s): Biology
New ideas may contradict existing, accepted ideas.
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on the evidence supporting them. Ideas that are consistent with experimental data and can be replicated by other researchers are more likely to be accepted. Conversely, ideas that lack evidence or are inconsistent with established scientific principles are more likely to be rejected.
paradigm
paradigm
Shakespeare was not known for his ideas. He was known for his plays, which were indeed immediately popular.
Scandanavia
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on evidence, experimental results, and how well they align with existing theories and principles. Ideas that can be tested, replicated, and provide new insights into the natural world are more likely to be accepted. Peer review by other experts in the field also plays a crucial role in evaluating the validity and significance of new scientific ideas.
Neils Bohr