A parents' responsibility is to properly raise the children and give them a good foundation on which to build upon later in life. So... Yes if: The child has any type of disability, if the child is younger than 13, or if the parent could not control their child, and did not ask for help. But... No if: The child is in their teen years and does not have a disability that would include horrible behavior. It's the kids' fault, the kid did it, so why should the parents be responsible for it?
18
because there the parents dauhhh
No, at age 19, the "child" is an adult responsible for his own actions. The parent has no legal authority to make the 19 year old do what the parent wishes, therefore the parent cannot be held liable for the child's actions.
Responsible parents do. How else will a parent find out if a child is on drugs or is violating some other rule of yourhome.
Parents are responsible until the age of majority, which is 18, although in some states the child can choose to leave home at 17 and cannot be forced to return (a loophole created by state law allowing a child to go to jail at 17). Ina strange twist, in those states (like Georgia) should the child leave at 17, the parents are legally responsible for some of their actions until 18.
Parents or guardians should play a role in addressing and resolving the bullying behavior of their child. While they may not be directly responsible for the child's actions, they have a responsibility to teach and guide their child on appropriate behavior and intervene if necessary. Collaboration between parents, the school, and other relevant stakeholders is crucial in addressing and preventing bullying effectively.
parents are in every way responsible for their child and they should always be there if the child is in need of their parent.
18
yes
because there the parents dauhhh
Yes. They are a minor and the parents are still responsible for their child's actions.
yeah because the parents of the child trusted the other parents to take care of their son/daughter
No, the child is 18 therefor an adult in charge of their own actions.
Not only could parents be remiss in supervision, but also willfully negligent. In any case, a juvenile offender can be prosecuted for criminal acts, while the parents could be held liable in civil actions.
Parents can be held responsible for their children's actions in some cases, particularly if they have been directly negligent in supervising or controlling their child's behavior. However, each situation is unique and factors such as the age of the child and the severity of the offense should be taken into consideration before assigning blame solely to the parents.
cons:a parent can't control a child when they are away from home. pro:a parent should have shown a child right from wrong before they leave home.
Unless it is punishable by law, children are not legally held accountable for their actions, but their parents can because they are responsible for the actions of their children.