no he did not because he is the bad guy
Well most likely not since there's supposed to be 5 seasons of Star Wars: The Clone Wars. There have been rumors that Rex was actually part of Vader storming the Jedi Temple in Revenge of the Sith, but since there hasn't been any proof so far, his fate is still unknown.
George Lucas is the original writer for star wars, he has changed it for good or for bad (most who saw the original say for bad) and wrote the prequels when filming the original.
Yes, it was the right idea for Disney to buy the star.
That's just the type of thing that they prefer. The storyline of Star Trek may not appeal to them as much as the storyline of Star Wars. On Star Trek the good guys are not all good, and the bad guys are not all bad. Some people may be uncomfortable with this character shading which mirrors real life, and they prefer the straightforward good versus evil conflict of Star Wars. I think that clever peole like star trek and the rest of you just like the violence in star wars.
no he did not because he is the bad guy
Yes. He is the first bad clone but Captain Rex captures him.
That depends on a person's point of view. In mine, he is good.
In my opinion the books are not as good as the movies but most of the Star Wars comics are really good.
Well most likely not since there's supposed to be 5 seasons of Star Wars: The Clone Wars. There have been rumors that Rex was actually part of Vader storming the Jedi Temple in Revenge of the Sith, but since there hasn't been any proof so far, his fate is still unknown.
Palpatine
No, I have played through a lot of star wars the old republic and I have not seen any bad language or blood/ violence
good
no man too bad
The Empire and the Borg The Federation and the Rebels from Star wars are good guys and would become allies in fighting the bad guys.
Star wars is the best story because the choosen one becomes bad but there is still something good in him.
Darth Vader is at first but the bad guy in the end is Darth maul