they fired with greater accuracy than the muskets. IMPROVEMENT. Their useful range was of more than 1 kilometer, while they were lethal within a range of 600 meters.
they were better because they had riffled barrels which caused the bullet to spin. think of a football with a perfect spiral compared to a football going end over end. hope this helps
100,00o muskets in 1854.
The British used muskets in battle. in the late 1700's they where developed so the gun powder went into the muskets "pan" and was ignited.
Similar to modern day shotgun
Muskets- a smoothbore firearm. Not as accurate, but better than bows and pikes.
I prefer to use crossbows because bolts are cheaper than arrows :)
Yes, short bows have higher DPS than long bows. (Excluding bows such as dark bow with dragon arrows and the Zaryte bow)
help answer it
The rifles had much better range and accuracy over smoothbore muskets.
Answers may include any 3 of the following: horses, bows, muskets, cannons, metal helmets
Better ballistics, better range, more accuracy. Muskets, however, did have an advantage at close range in that they could fire "buck and ball" ammunition, which was basically some buckshot attached to the musket ball. When fired, the buckshot would separate and spread out.
yes
These armies had primitive muskets with them, but they are very unreliable. Muskets were very to carry and slow to fire. The cannon was especially frustrating as it was difficult to transport, load, and aim and was used primarily for siege warfare. Non gunpowder weapons, such as knights, swords, pikes, and bows still played a huge role too.
Yes
In New France people used weapons as protection. They used different types of muskets such as: Light hunting muskets Flintlock muskets Muskets with bayonets They also used swords, pikes, hatchets, halbards, throwing-axes, and tomahawks.
kessel bows down to iginla.