because weaponised machinery had not been used on such a large scale before as it had been in ww1?
Very few women 'fought' in World War 1. Over 30 million men fought, & more than 8 million men died.
It was fought in more than one country. Bosnia-herzegovina, Austria,Germany, France, and Belgium mostly
No, there were alot of countries that fought in WW2. There was Germany and Japan; and than England, Russia, US, Canada, France (?)
world war 2 was more of a world war. It was fought on more fronts and included more countries.
i really dont know lol
because weaponised machinery had not been used on such a large scale before as it had been in ww1?
Yes
Very few women 'fought' in World War 1. Over 30 million men fought, & more than 8 million men died.
Differently THAN is correct. My question was: is it "differently than" or "differently from" but I can't find any examples of "differently from" in all of Google, so I have to assume "differently than" is the correct choice. 'Different FROM' is correct, from this. 'differently from' arises. Searching Google [I notice your correct but unusual capitalisation of the proper noun ' Google'] implies you are interested in the wisdom of crowds rather than grammatical correctness.
It was fought in more than one country. Bosnia-herzegovina, Austria,Germany, France, and Belgium mostly
in 1923
There were far more than 2
Corinthians teaches us that as christians we need to think and act differently than the world
No, there were alot of countries that fought in WW2. There was Germany and Japan; and than England, Russia, US, Canada, France (?)
world war 2 was more of a world war. It was fought on more fronts and included more countries.
WW I was bigger than previous wars, because all the powerful nations of the world were involved on one side or the other, in two vast, opposed alliances (the Triple Entente vs. the Central Powers). No previous war had involved the whole world.