They could and they perceived that doing this was their duty as pious Muslims.
Historically, there was the "Right to Conquest" which was a pervasive idea in political thought. The idea was that it was natural for any country or state to grow and control more territory as it grew stronger. This allowed weaker states to dissolve in place of ones that were better run, a bureaucratic version of "survival of the fittest". The "Right to Conquest" prevailed as the dominant theory of nation-building until the mid-1800s when people started bringing up the concept of self-sovereignty and ethnic nationalism, which held the idea that people should govern themselves even if they are not the most powerful in the world. This view of state sovereignty has become dominant today and the Right to Conquest is seen as incorrect.
Since the Caliphates existed well within the Right to Conquest Period, the Caliphs did not have to assert a reason to conquer neighboring territories in Southwest Asia. It was their natural prerogative.
-the Mughals ruled most of India from 1525 to 1857. -they were a Timurid empire from Persia. -their population was between 110 to 150 million. -the Mughals were Muslims, although they ruled a large number of Hindus.
No. Iraq was one of several regions that came under the historic control of Persia on different occasions. However, these regions were never called "Persia". Iraq generally went by the name "Mesopotamia".The historic country of Persia is properly identified with the modern Islamic Republic of Iran, which is its successor-state (post-revolution).
They could and they perceived that doing this was their duty as pious Muslims.Historically, there was the "Right to Conquest" which was a pervasive idea in political thought. The idea was that it was natural for any country or state to grow and control more territory as it grew stronger. This allowed weaker states to dissolve in place of ones that were better run, a bureaucratic version of "survival of the fittest". The "Right to Conquest" prevailed as the dominant theory of nation-building until the mid-1800s when people started bringing up the concept of self-sovereignty and ethnic nationalism, which held the idea that people should govern themselves even if they are not the most powerful in the world. This view of state sovereignty has become dominant today and the Right to Conquest is seen as incorrect.Since the Caliphates existed well within the Right to Conquest Period, the Caliphs did not have to assert a reason to conquer neighboring territories in Southwest Asia. It was their natural prerogative.
Egypt
from Persia in the middle ages
the british, they owned many countries such as India and Egypt back then
no persia did not conquer europe
King Philip did not conquer Persia because he was assassinated.
Yes, he did.
Persia did not conquer Greece. Persia attempted to conquer Greece but the invasion was repelled. Earlier, Greeks had fought against Persia in the Ionian Revolt, and the Persian invasion was intended as retribution for the violation of Persian temples.
Philip II of Macedon planned an invasion to conquer Persia but was murdered shortly before the invasion began.
To conquer Persia
Conquer Persia
Mesopotamia.
Persia
Philip 2.
Gaugamela.