Britain, easily.
Yes, the war brought about a social revolution in Britain. Shared experiences of those involved in the war and those families that were left behind caused great social change.
Great Britain was more of an ally to the South during the Civil War. The British hoped the South would win giving England more of chance to import large quantities of cotton.
It hoped to receive support from Great Britain and France by staying in the war
If Hitler took Poland then Britain and France would declare war on him, which they did.
War with Germany
The position of Great Britain in the US Civil War was one of neutrality. The Confederacy hoped that Great Britain would officially recognize the Confederacy as a nation, however, this did not happen.
First, they hoped that Britain and France would grant them recognition and send military aid. When Lincoln forestalled this by issuing the Emancipation Proclamation, (making the war look like a crusade against slavery), they hoped that the North would simply become war-weary and vote Lincoln out in the '64 election.
Depends on who pushes the button on the Nukes, but without those I'd have to say Britain.. Side note: There are no winners in a war.
Jefferson preferred the embargo act of 1807 to because he hoped that it would prevent a war between the United States and Britain.
Washington was impressed. He hoped that it inspired people(soldiers).-kayla
No, the urgent need was to keep Britain out of the war by turning it into a crusade against slavery. It was also hoped that this would restore Northern morale.
Britain.
Britain
Britain, easily.
Patrick Henry.
Patrick Henry.