1.1 million German casualties in WW1.
There are no figures for the total number of casualties caused by machine guns in WW1. But an internet search found an example of the effectiveness of the weapon - On the first day of the Somme Offensive, the British lost 60.000 soldiers mostly due to machine gun fire.
The physical cost of World War I was tremendous. The total count of casualties was nearly 40 million people. That number included military and civilian casualties, and represented deaths due to fighting, as well as disease.
New weapons increased the casualties in ww1 becasue further most we were learning new ways
In WW1 Disease.
1.1 million German casualties in WW1.
There are no figures for the total number of casualties caused by machine guns in WW1. But an internet search found an example of the effectiveness of the weapon - On the first day of the Somme Offensive, the British lost 60.000 soldiers mostly due to machine gun fire.
The physical cost of World War I was tremendous. The total count of casualties was nearly 40 million people. That number included military and civilian casualties, and represented deaths due to fighting, as well as disease.
New weapons increased the casualties in ww1 becasue further most we were learning new ways
The total number of military and civilian casualties in World War I, was around 37.5 million. There were 16.5 million deaths and 21 million wounded making it the 6th deadliest conflict in human history.
Switzerland did not take part in World War One, it was neutral. It did not have an casualties.
There were 26,094 Australian casualties at Gallipoli, but no record clearly indicates the number of amputees.
In WW1 Disease.
the maxim gun
America arrived late in WW1, and as a result had little effect on the outcome of the war. American casualties of WW1 equals to about 39,000 whereas Australia had over 61,000 casualties.
There was about 200,000 casualties.... Honored and brave they faught as our soldiers... Kaye Lynch Haskins LJMS STUDENT
briton was ;; the soviet union