After the fantastic loss of life in World War I the free peoples were willing to accept almost anything in order to avaoid another war. Since they did not realize just how evil and megalomaniacal Hitler was, they thought (or at least hoped) that by giving in to his various demands, each of which, taken by itself was not wholly unreasonable, that he would eventually be appeased and would not make further demands. Michael Montagne To prevent Hitler from taking over Europe Britain and France adopted the appeasement policy which gave Hitler a little of what he wanted in the hope of appeasing him.
On the first day of World War II in 1939, the British poet and leftist W.H. Auden critiqued the behavior of Western governments and called the 1930s "a low, dishonest decade". The object of Auden's condemnation was the policy of "appeasement" pursued by Western governments in the face of German, Italian, and Japanese aggression. Appeasement was based on three assumptions:
What do these assumptions add up to? A fear of resorting to any sort of violence or armed conflict. This policy is most closely related to British prime minister Neville Chamberlain about his ignorance towards Nazi Germany. in 1933, Hitler removed Germany from the League of Nations. In 1935, he defied the disarmament provisions of the Treaty of Versailles. Germany reoccupied the Rhineland in 1936. In March 1938, Hitler annexed Austria (further proving that he wanted to bring all Germans into his Reich). The Nazis' next target was Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia, a region with a large ethnic German population. The Czechs did not want to give way, and the French and Polish governments were willing to come to their aid. But Neville Chamberlain still obliged Hitler. Chamberlain agreed to Hitler's terms thinking that if Hitler unified all Germans into one state, then German ambitions would be satisfied. This was a clear example of the policy of appeasement. In fear of sustained war and in hopes of maintaining a balanced, peaceful power structured in Europe, Chamberlain let Hitler go on. (Chamberlain was soon proved dead wrong on September 29, 1938 when Hitler requested non-German territory and shocked Europe).
The term has become derogatory ('negative'). It's NOT a neutral word for a policy of the inter-war period. In the early 1920s (probably 1921-23) the British government came to take the view that the Versailles Treaty of 1919 had beentoo harsh, and it was willing in principle to make changes in order to meet some of the German grievances. By about 1924-25 even the French government took a similar view of some aspects. In the 1920s German reparations payments were adjusted twice (1924 and 1929), the occupation of the Rhineland ended early, and in 1926 Germany was admitted to the League of Nations instead of being excluded as an 'outcast' nation. At that stage there was no question of altering any borders in favour of Germany. All these earlyconcessions were made to a democratic Germany. When Hitler came to power he set about undoing the Versailles Treaty as fast as he could. From late 1933 he managed to set the agenda (until 1940-41, in fact). As a result, Britain and France found themselves always caught unprepared by new demands made by Hitler. At just about every point Hitler took the initiative, often amid bullying and threats. Britain and France tolerated or accepted the following major breaches of the Treaty of Versailles from 1935 onwards:
Appeasement was, in hindsight it appears ill conceived, an attempt by Britain, largely supported by the French, to avoid a repitition of the first World War.
Given that the politicians at the time had lived through WW1 it had a very noble attribute of avoiding the deaths of millions of people.
Unfortunately it was seen by Hitler as a show of weakness on the part of the Allies.
Appeasement.
appeasement
Policy of appeasement.
No it failed
appeasement
Appeasement.
Not having to go to war and avoid the terrible loss of life sustained in World War 1
AppeasementThe policy of appeasement.
why did France and britiain choose the policy of appeasement
Appeasement is the policy of giving in to the demands of an aggressor to keep the peace.
Appeasement never works. See answer to this question.What_is_wrong_with_the_policy_of_appeasement
The policy of appeasement.
The policy of appeasement was not successful at all. The Axis powers had no interest in brokering peace but wanted war.
Appeasement
no
appeasement
yes