The North's greatest strength or resource during the Civil War was its industry.
Bombs and fires destroyed much of London.
The North - very much so.
very few compared to the north
The easiest anwser is that the North had technology, shear number of troops, and industry on their side. The South had much better generals, a more willingness to fight, and that the war was fought in their back yard
The North's greatest strength or resource during the Civil War was its industry.
Much freer for slaves. Pretty much the same in both for whites
One advantage was their superior industrial capacity, but the North also had a much larger population with which to replenish their losses.
The Southern states struggled to recover from the US Civil War because the war was fought mainly in the southern states. Their cities, farms, railroads and industries were largely destroyed by the Union army during the war and a much larger proportion of southerners died during the war, depriving the south of infrastructure and workers to rebuild it.
Pennsylvania was for the north during the Civil War.
Reconstruction means rebuilding. During the Civil War, much of the South was destroyed. Reconstruction was rebuilding AFTER the war- both physical rebuilding, and rebuilding the government in the former Confederate States.
In the Civil War, the Union was simply the name for the North - that is, those parts of the USA that had not seceded. I don't think there was much collective bargaining in the workplace.
To prevent them from exporting their plentiful cotton in exchange for much-needed war supplies.
Bombs and fires destroyed much of London.
Much of Syria has become a disaster zone: In September, the opposition group Syrian Network for Human Rights estimated that more than 2.9 million homes, schools, mosques, churches and hospitals had been damaged or destroyed since the uprising began in March 2011. More than half a million are a complete loss.
nobody
The North - very much so.