0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How many Japanese Americans were interred in 1942?
The numbers vary but it was around 110,000 and 120,000. FDR authorized the interment which was upheld by the Supreme Court. Jimmy Carter, in 1980 opened an investigation into this and it was found that race was the reason that the Japanese were interred. Regan signed the Civil Liberties Act in 1988 which gave $20,000 to each survivor or heirs. The U.S. government eventually disbursed more than $1.6 billion to 82,219 Japanese Americans who had been interned.
What was the main cause of civil war?
it depends, the main cause of the civil war in England in the 16 hundreds was the disagreement between the monarchy and parliament over power. people that supported the monarchy were known as royalists and thought that the king or queen should have the power to run the country on their own. people that supported the parliament were known as parliamentarians. they believed that the country should be run by elected officials so the best interests of the public were upheld. i have no idea about the America or any other civil wars.
What is the court case that upheld Executive order 9066 as constitutional?
Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943) , Yasui v. United States, 320 U.S. 115 (1943) and notably Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944) . ~ see links below .
End results of the American Civil War?
The end result of the Civil War was that it was afterwards written into law that no state can leave the Union; the South was virtually destroyed; the vast majority of slaves were freed (those who were in the Confederate states); afterwards blacks were awarded citizenship; the South became industrialized after the war with the arrival of the Yankee carpetbaggers; and the old antibellum, plantation based South was essentially wiped off the map. The federal government now ranked supreme, and put an end to the idea of secession. The federal government could now override southern legislation. It provided an opportunity for the grown of the transcontinental railroad. This united most of the country. To name a few.Consequences of the Civil WarThere were numerous consequences of the Civil War. The union was upheld and the states' rights theories of John C. Calhoun were settled in favor of the fact that the United States was not a federation of states but a nation, one and indivisible. The political dominance of the South was destroyed as a result of the war. Northeastern industrial and financial interests came to influence the direction of the nation and the economy. The west was developed after the war on the basis of some of the legislation passed by Congress during the war. Congress subsidized the building of the transcontinental railroads. Railroad companies received vast acreage in the west which they later sold to farmers and ranchers populating the West. The Republican Congress also enacted higher tariffs which increased taxes on imported goods. The income tax was used during the war, later to become a permanent part of the Constitution. The debt of the government increased. Perhaps the most obvious consequence of the Civil War was the end of slavery. While the slaves were now freemen, the Civil War would also usher in the period of Reconstruction which would have a divisive and lasting effect on the nation as a whole.
What was the outcome of People v Croswell?
Croswell's conviction was upheld, but he didn't suffer any punishment. In 1805, the NY legislature changed their libel law in accordance with how Hamilton had argued the case. Essentially the NY legislature said that truth was an affirmative defense in most libel cases, breaking with English common law. Hamilton's view of Libel law is, broadly speaking, the law through out the United States. There are exceptions, so consult an attorney if you are going to defame someone, esp. a non-public figure, with malicious intent.
What groups split between The Missouri Compromise?
The Missouri Compromise splits the early America into the South (where slavery is upheld) and the North ( Where slavery is banned)
Was The Supreme Court on several occasions has upheld automatic expatriation?
FALSE! The Supreme Court has never upheld automatic expatration.
How did the supreme court use the constitution to uphold slavery?
The Supreme Court upheld slavery through decisions like the 1857 Dred Scott v. Sandford case, which ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court. This decision allowed for the expansion of slavery into US territories and reinforced the idea that African Americans were considered property under the Constitution.
Which supreme court upheld the constitutionality of the second bank of the United states?
they had a baby
Koremastu v U.S.?
The Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Japanese relocation
Was the same-sex marriage bill signed by Maine Governor Baldacci upheld by the Supreme Court?
No, that marriage bill was repealed by ballot measure before it could take effect.
What US supreme court case upheld the concept of preventive detention for juveniles?
In re kemmlr
Which wartime policy was upheld toward Japanese Americans by the Supreme Court?
Confinement in internment camps
How was the US Supreme Court influenced by Plessy v Ferguson?
It upheld the "separate but equal" doctrine.
The Dred Scott decision on the issue of slavery upheld the Southern viewpoint that?
...slavery was protected by the constitution on the grounds that a man's property was sacred and slaves were property.
What was Frederick the great's view on slavery?
Frederick the Great of Prussia tolerated and upheld slavery in his colonies as a means of economic profitability and expansion. He viewed slavery as a necessary institution for the prosperity of his territories.
Why were southern states pleased with the supreme court ruling on dred Scott?
Southern states were pleased with the Dred Scott ruling because it upheld the legality of slavery in the territories, stating that Congress could not ban slavery in new states. This decision aligned with the pro-slavery sentiments prevalent in the southern states during that time.
