Because most of the industries were established in the North, whose economy was largely based upon the production and trade of industrial products, while the economy of the South was mostly based upon monoculture and crops developed by slaves' labour. Therefore the North needed a massive employment of more and more specialized manpower, which had to live in the vicinity of the factories, thus growing the size of the cities. The South needed instead more and more land to exploit its agricultural production.
no, there were more in the north than the south
The North was more industrialized while the South was agrarian.
During those times, the South focused more on agriculture, farming, growing crops (cotton, tobacco, indigo, and rice), and found no need for factories. To them, slaves and land were what they should be their priority.
The north had many factories and rail roads, making them far more advanced then the south. Britain however depended more on the south than the north because they needed cotton and the south was who supplied it. Tax was far better in the North too, it went up 80% during the Civil War. Which was better than the souths 9000%. Think about a gumball being $450. That's partially why the south was defeated my the north.
The North had more factories than the South because the South relied on their agricultural based economy.
The answer you seek is true.
The North had less farm machinery than the South.
The difference between industrialization in the North and the South was the factories were mostly located in the North. The South had plantations and raised crops, while the North had factories to produce clothing and furniture.
The third statement is untrue. The Northern advantage in manufacturing industry was most significant, especially in the increasingly mechanised farming techniques.
Slavery disappeared in the north because they used more factories and they were based on industry rather than agriculture like in the south
the South had more political and economic power in Congress.
All of their factories combined: they could replace losses of arms and materiel more easily than the South.
yup because they had factories in the north and no or little plantations so less work for them to do :)
Because most of the industries were established in the North, whose economy was largely based upon the production and trade of industrial products, while the economy of the South was mostly based upon monoculture and crops developed by slaves' labour. Therefore the North needed a massive employment of more and more specialized manpower, which had to live in the vicinity of the factories, thus growing the size of the cities. The South needed instead more and more land to exploit its agricultural production.
The South had the big plantations which needed a huge work force. The North had factories which didn't need quite as much unskilled labor.
The South's labor system was generally more farming than factories. The north were much more advanced in the lines of production and had started to adopt more techniques that we use today. The south's labor system was largely based on slaves doing the work for no money, where as the north was free with wages paid.