Knights were considered as skillful soldier who did battle for honor. However, knights also fought for their country in order to get paid.
knights served kings
they had sleepless knights
Knights got their equipment from their lords.
Knights FIGHT
Theoretically, kings paid knights for their services as mounted warriors. Most knights came from the landowning class, so their wealth was their land.
Knights were considered as skillful soldier who did battle for honor. However, knights also fought for their country in order to get paid.
His Mom
both
Knights had a source of income, usually from the produce of an estate they owned or manageed, but sometimes direct payment from a noble they served.
The knights payed for them. A knight was not only a fighting elite, but most of the time had to come from a wealthy backround. It was a status and class of person being a knight.
Well, technically they were. Their Lords paid them with land as long as they were loyal and they continued to protect their lord's land and the people on the land. But money wise, no.
No, British knights do not receive earnings for their title. Knighthood is an honorary title bestowed by the monarch, and it does not come with any financial benefits. Knights may, however, receive allowances or stipends in some cases for official duties or ceremonies.
The Nobles and knights - the knights counted too, because if the nobles lost power they would too; the nobles were the ones who paid them, and the nobles were getting powerless, so that was the same for the knights. if the commoners didnt get paid to go to war then it would be a different story. Hope that makes any sense. O(^__^)O
medieval atilliator makes crossbows for knights in the army. They are highly paid.
they got there money at thr end of a battle when they looyed the others stuff they also got honor
Knights fought for their land and nobles before the king was considered and only when the king paid them would they then fight for him