Wiki User
∙ 13y agoValid = fact from truth
problem truth can lie
if I was hot I'm god
I'm hot thus I'm god
Sound is just all factual
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoexamples of internal and external validity
Causal validity is also referred to as internal validity. It refers to how well experiments are done and what we can infer from those results.
The difference between internal and external validity is in their nature. Internal validity indicates if a study depicts relation between two variables. External validity on the other hand generalizes the study of the variables.
External validity is the extent that results from a study generalize to other people, places, and situations--how well the findings stand outside the study and the extent to which they can be replicated. The internal validity is that extent to which the study's design enables it to measure and study what it intends to study.
validity is whether the results are valid so the data has no mistakes of as such in it whereas reliability is the dependability; when the results you have are accurate and are of enough quality.
Validity
Validity
Legal soundness or force
The truth of an argument is referred to as its validity, while the soundness of an argument requires both validity and true premises. A valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises, while a sound argument is also based on true premises.
validate (v.) To declare or make legally valid.:To mark with an indication of official sanction.:To establish the soundness of; corroborate.
A basis for a conclusion is the evidence, facts, or reasoning that supports the conclusion being drawn. It is the foundation upon which the conclusion is built and is used to demonstrate the validity and soundness of the conclusion.
The term flaws is meant to state that there is a deficiency or imperfection within in a object or thing. Another accurate definition is that flaws indicate a defect impairing legal soundness or validity.
An argument is considered valid when the conclusion logically follows from the premises provided. In other words, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. Validity is a key criterion in determining the soundness of an argument.
-noun 1. a feature that mars the perfection of something; defect; fault: beauty without flaw; the flaws in our plan. 2. a defect impairing legal soundness or validity. 3. a crack, break, breach, or rent.
When two points of view are syllogized, (a branch of logic) and if a reasonable deduction be found to satisfy both combatants, that would symbolize (to them) a sound truth as to the're points of view.
Philosopher Bertrand Russell emphasized the importance of critical thinking in analyzing arguments. He wrote that to engage in critical thinking, one must be able to evaluate arguments objectively and assess their validity and soundness.
Verifying the conclusion is important to ensure that it accurately reflects the information and reasoning provided in the argument. It helps to confirm that the conclusion logically follows from the premises and that it is supported by evidence. This verification process helps to strengthen the validity and soundness of the argument.