88, rather nicely uses 8 characters in Roman numerals: LXXXVIII.
The Roman numeral for 10 is X
Yes under today's rules governing the Roman numeral system XCIX is 99 But during the Roman era the equivalent of 99 was probably IC (100-1 = 99)
1
XXX is the Roman numeral for 30. XL is the Roman numeral for 40.
88, rather nicely uses 8 characters in Roman numerals: LXXXVIII.
As a roman numeral, this has too many symbols. XL are tens (40), IV are the units (4), so the first four symbols represent the number 44. The additional symbols are not appropriate for a roman numeral.
The Roman numeral for 10 is X
Yes under today's rules governing the Roman numeral system XCIX is 99 But during the Roman era the equivalent of 99 was probably IC (100-1 = 99)
1
XXX is the Roman numeral for 30. XL is the Roman numeral for 40.
How about X for 10 or XI for 11
yes
The largest value Roman numeral that you can write, which conforms to the rules of writing Roman numerals, using just D, C and L symbols is DCCCL (850)
The Roman numeral MCMXXV is the number 1925.
The Roman numeral system needed only 7 symbols while the ancient Greek numeral system needed 27 symbols
The number 27 as a Roman numeral is XXVII