publish the data in an academic journal
"precise information provided by numerical data" is the scientific term
Theory.
You write that the data supported your hypothesis.
empirical data
Personal opinions, beliefs, or anecdotes that are not supported by empirical evidence will not be considered valid within a scientific theory. Theories must be testable, falsifiable, and based on systematic observation and data analysis. Emotional reasoning or cultural bias should also not influence the development or acceptance of a scientific theory.
An argument that is supported by research and strong evidence is typically referred to as a well-founded argument. This type of argument relies on credible sources, data, and logical reasoning to bolster its claims and conclusions.
This a Study Island Question. The answer is "Scientific Theories are supported by evidence or data."
after they have collected there results
A conclusion or assertion would be considered to be scientifically valid if the data are accurate and the reasoning based on that data is, as far as we can tell, correctly reasoned. Science does not deal in absolute truth, which is why scientists prefer the term valid, which indicates that as far as we presently know, this statement is true, although new data and/or new reasoning may cause us to change our minds in the future.
evidence, experimentation, and observational data that consistently confirm its predictions and conclusions.
An argument that is supported by research and strong evidence is one that is based on credible sources, data, and studies that back up the claims being made. This type of argument is more persuasive and reliable because it is not just based on opinions or beliefs, but on concrete evidence that has been thoroughly researched and analyzed.
A hypothesis is a statement that summarizes experimental data in a scientific context. It is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon based on observations and existing knowledge.
Because good observations ensure accurate data and valid conclusions.
Facts need to be proven by strong evidence, data, and reliable sources. They should be verifiable and supported by research or empirical observations to establish their accuracy and credibility.
Toulmin's model for a good argument consists of six components: claim, data, warrant, backing, rebuttal, and qualifier. The claim is the main statement being argued, supported by data or evidence. The warrant is the reasoning that connects the data to the claim, while the backing provides additional support. The rebuttal addresses counterarguments, and the qualifier acknowledges the limitations or uncertainties of the argument.
Scientifically accurate means that the information or data presented is supported by scientific research, experimentation, and evidence. It is based on established scientific principles and has been rigorously tested and verified by the scientific community.