Illogical thinking is defined as not thinking rationally about something or someone. It is being without reason or lacking sense in something.
If by critical thinking you mean rational thinking, then illogical thinking is it's opposite and excludes it of necessity. If instead you simply mean "thinking that is effective", then illogical thinking interferes only insofar as rational thinking is effective. Our society holds up rational analysis as an ideal, but in some situations intuitive, seemingly illogical thought produces better results. Critical thinking is sequential. Each stage or step of the thought process must be analyzed and found to be correct before moving on to the next step and the next step. And so on toward a purposeful end. This is a structured process. For example: "If A then B, if B then C, if C then D." If each step is reasoned and correct then also: "if A then D follows." Illogical thinking would interfere with the sequence somewhere, interfering and breaking the chain. For example: "If A then B, if B then K, if C then D." There's no link from B to C, interfering with the sequence.
It's called illogical extrapolation.
logic
to find the illogical statement
means without logic
He was illogical in his thinking.
Illogical is from the Greek word logos (reason or thinking). The prefix il- signifies "without"
If by critical thinking you mean rational thinking, then illogical thinking is it's opposite and excludes it of necessity. If instead you simply mean "thinking that is effective", then illogical thinking interferes only insofar as rational thinking is effective. Our society holds up rational analysis as an ideal, but in some situations intuitive, seemingly illogical thought produces better results. Critical thinking is sequential. Each stage or step of the thought process must be analyzed and found to be correct before moving on to the next step and the next step. And so on toward a purposeful end. This is a structured process. For example: "If A then B, if B then C, if C then D." If each step is reasoned and correct then also: "if A then D follows." Illogical thinking would interfere with the sequence somewhere, interfering and breaking the chain. For example: "If A then B, if B then K, if C then D." There's no link from B to C, interfering with the sequence.
The psychodynamic model does not solely attribute abnormal behavior to illogical thinking patterns. Instead, it emphasizes unconscious conflicts, early childhood experiences, and unresolved emotional issues as key factors contributing to abnormal behavior. While illogical thinking may play a role, the psychodynamic model focuses on a deeper exploration of unconscious processes.
No, that is illogical thinking. Think about your question.
That is a contradiction in thinking and illogical. Something can't be young and old at the same time.
Yes, it is perfectly logical to do so, especially where considering the boundaries of logic itself, where that logic is applied in ways contrary to normal logic forms, or where suing logic to prove that the illogical truly is illogical (for example, proving that an assumption is incorrect as it would lead to a contradiction, the basis of RAA, means logically considering the illogical).
a person's past experiences shape their belief system and thinking patterns. People form illogical, irrational thinking patterns that become the cause of both their negative emotions and of further irrational ideas.
It's called illogical extrapolation.
The Illogical Consequence was created in 2005.
Highly Illogical was created in 1993.
the processes that are not logical are called illogical processes