answersLogoWhite

0

What date is iii iv iiiv?

Updated: 11/5/2022
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Best Answer

III = 3.

IV = 4.

IIIV = is wrong. It is possibly VIII for 8.

Therefore, as a date: 3.4.8 doesn't make sense.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What date is iii iv iiiv?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How was Ivan IV related to Ivan III?

Ivan IV, the Terrible, was the grandson of Ivan III, the Great.


What comes after roman numeral IV?

I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII IX, XI, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII IX, XI, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII IX, XI, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII IX, XI, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII IX, XI, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII IX, X


Can you use atf iii dextron where atf t-iv is recommened?

No you can not. While Dexron IV is backward compatible with Dex III, Dex III is not forward compatible. Vehicles that require Dex IV must use Dex IV.


When did Pope Timothy III - IV - of Alexandria die?

Pope Timothy III - IV - of Alexandria died in 535.


What does IIIV mean in roman numerals?

Nothing. If it's supposed to refer to a number, like Eight, it is written as VIII, not IIIV.


What is pi in Roman numerals?

first 50 numbers of pi in roman numerals III. I IV I V II VI V III V VIII IX VIII IX III II III III VIII IV VI II VI IV III III VIII III II VII IX V NULLA II VIII VIII IV I IX VII I IX III IX IX III VII V I NULLA


What does v iii ii you iv mean in numerals?

v iii ii you iv mean in numerals means v means 5 , iii means 3, ii means 2 and iv means 4.


Was Ivan IV son of Ivan III?

No, his father was Vasili III


What comes after III?

In Roman numerals, after III (3) is IV (4).


Who was Benedict III's predecessor?

He was preceded by Pope Leo IV. Pope Nicholas I was the pope following Benedict III.


Is Heparin classified as a Schedule I II III IV or IV drug?

1v


What number is 111V?

Two Three (III) before five (V) means minus 5 - 3 = 2 Though IIIV is not a proper Roman numeral II is correct for two