Yes and Latin the word for IC is 'undecentum' meaning one from a hundred.
IC is a simplification of LXXXXVIIII because by placing I to both sides of these numerals they work out as IC (-1+100 = 99)
But under today's rules 99 in Roman numerals are XCIX
The term "IC manority" is not commonly used and does not have a widely recognized definition. It is possible that it could be a misspelling or misinterpretation of another term. Therefore, without further context or clarification, it is difficult to provide a specific answer.
Converting between Arabic and Roman Numbers we get that : roman numeral value for 741 is DCCXLI as C=100 .
That is not a properly formed Roman numeral. CC =200 XC = 90 IC = 99??? which is correctly indicated with XCIX
No, "XCIX" is not the greatest two-digit Roman numeral number. The greatest two-digit Roman numeral number is "XC" which represents 90. "XCIX" represents 99.
In today' notation of Roman numerals it stands for 99 but during the Roman era the equivalent of 99 in Roman numerals would have probably been written out simply as IC (100-1 = 99)
The term "IC manority" is not commonly used and does not have a widely recognized definition. It is possible that it could be a misspelling or misinterpretation of another term. Therefore, without further context or clarification, it is difficult to provide a specific answer.
Converting between Arabic and Roman Numbers we get that : roman numeral value for 741 is DCCXLI as C=100 .
That is not a properly formed Roman numeral. CC =200 XC = 90 IC = 99??? which is correctly indicated with XCIX
No, "XCIX" is not the greatest two-digit Roman numeral number. The greatest two-digit Roman numeral number is "XC" which represents 90. "XCIX" represents 99.
In today' notation of Roman numerals it stands for 99 but during the Roman era the equivalent of 99 in Roman numerals would have probably been written out simply as IC (100-1 = 99)
Today it is written out as XCIX but the Romans themselves would have probably calculated it as LXXXXVIIII and then simplified it to IC (-1+100 = 99) in fact the Latin word for 99 is 'undecentum' which literally means one from a hundred.
In today's notation it is XCIX but the Romans themselves probably would have notated it as IC because it's a simplified version of LXXXXVIIII
In today's modern terms 99 in Roman numerals is XCIX. But in times past the Romans themselves would have probably calculated 99 on an abacus counting device as LXXXXVIIII and then wrote it out in the simplified form of IC (-1+100 = 99) In fact the Latin word for 99 is "undecentum" which literally means one from a hundred. Today's rules governing the Roman numeral system were introduced during the Middle Ages but that was centuries after the disappearance of the Roman Empire.
The short answer is they should be IC but in accordance with today's rules governing the Roman numeral system 99 is notated as XCIX. But 9*11 is the equivalent of IX*XI which works out as -XI+CX=IC (-1+100=99) In fact the Romans themselves would have worked out the problem on an abacus counting device as LXXXXVIIII and probably simplified it to IC in written form because the Latin word for IC is 'undecentum' which literally means one from a hundred.
Under today's rules governing the Roman numeral system it is XCIX But the Romans themselves in the past would have probably worked out the equivalent of 99 as LXXXXVIIII and wrote it out simply as IC (100-1)
99 = IC (-1+100) But today's conversion of 99 into Roman numerals is XCIX However, the Romans themselves would have probably wrote out the number 99 as LXXXXVIIII which then can be simplified to IC
ic