'In' is correct.
just stop being a nerd
The appropriate preposition after "incorporated" depends on the context. Some common prepositions used with "incorporated" include "into" and "within." For example, "The new policies were incorporated into the company's procedures" or "The team was incorporated within the larger organization."
The difference is that "accustomed to" is a correct usage while "accustomed with" is incorrect.
I'm accustomed to dress differently than others.
The preposition is 'on an island'.Unless, of course, you've gone to a lot of trouble digging out a place where you can actually be in the island (underground).The preposition 'in the islands' is appropriate when referring to a group of islands, such as 'in the Bahamas' or 'in the Florida keys' as a group of islands represents a region; you can be in a region.
The ablative of accompaniment requires the appropriate case endings on the affected noun, and the preposition 'cum', which means 'with'. But the ablatives of instrument and of means require only the appropriate case endings on the affected noun. Neither one needs any preposition.
He began to get get accustomed to his odd schedule.
whats another word for accustomed?
The word is spelled accustomed, just as you spelled it.
Though there is, generally, no rule against ending a sentence with a preposition, the example cited here is, in fact, gramatically incorrect, which is why I separated it from the main question.Separating a preposition from its object (which is normally what you're talking about when you say "end a sentence with a preposition") is more accurately referred to as "preposition stranding", and is perfectly acceptable in the English language, either written or spoken, formal or informal.What's wrong with the sentence, "Can you go with?" is not that the preposition (with) is separated from its object, but that the object is completely missing.In addition to being improper English, this is also one of my all-time pet peeves.
Though there is, generally, no rule against ending a sentence with a preposition, the example cited here is, in fact, gramatically incorrect, which is why I separated it from the main question.Separating a preposition from its object (which is normally what you're talking about when you say "end a sentence with a preposition") is more accurately referred to as "preposition stranding", and is perfectly acceptable in the English language, either written or spoken, formal or informal.What's wrong with the sentence, "Can you go with?" is not that the preposition (with) is separated from its object, but that the object is completely missing.In addition to being improper English, this is also one of my all-time pet peeves.