examine the future and draw up plans of action
build up the structure, material and human of the undertaking
maintain activity among the personnel
bind together, unify and harmonise activity and effort
see that everything occurs in conformity with policy and practise
Fayol also synthesised 14 principles for organisational design and effective administration. It is worthwhile reflecting on these are comparing the conclusions to contemporary utterances by Peters, Kanter and Handy to name but three management gurus. Fayol's 14 principles are:
A principle of work allocation and specialisation in order to concentrate activities to enable specialisation of skills and understandings, more work focus and efficiency.
If responsibilities are allocated then the post holder needs the requisite authority to carry these out including the right to require others in the area of responsibility to undertake duties. Authority stems from:
The R = A correspondence is important to understand. R = A enables accountability in the delegation process. Who do we cope with situations where R > A? Are there work situations where our R< A?"judgment demands high moral character, therefore, a good leader should possess and infuse into those around him courage to accept responsibility. The best safeguard against abuse of authority and weakness on the part of a higher manager is personal integrity and particularly high moral character of such a manager ..... this integrity, is conferred neither by election nor ownership. " 1916A manager should never be given authority without responsibility--and also should never be given responsibility without the associated authority to get the work done.
The generalisation about discipline is that discipline is essential for the smooth running of a business and without it - standards, consistency of action, adherence to rules and values - no enterprise could prosper.
"in an essence - obedience, application, energy, behaviour and outward marks of respect observed in accordance with standing agreements between firms and its employees " 1916
The idea is that an employee should receive instructions from one superior only. This generalisation still holds - even where we are involved with team and matrix structures which involve reporting to more than one boss - or being accountable to several clients. The basic concern is that tensions and dilemmas arise where we report to two or more bosses. One boss may want X, the other Y and the subordinate is caught between the devil and the deep blue sea.
The unity of command idea of having one head (chief executive, cabinet consensus) with agree purposes and objectives and one plan for a group of activities) is clear.
Fayol's line was that one employee's interests or those of one group should not prevail over the organisation as a whole. This would spark a lively debate about who decides that the interests of the organisation as a whole are. Ethical dilemmas and matters of corporate risk and the behaviour of individual "chancers" are involved here. Fayol's work - assumes a shared set of values by people in the organisation - a unitarism where the reasons for organisational activities and decisions are in some way neutral and reasonable.
" the price of services rendered. " 1916The general principle is that levels of compensation should be "fair" and as far as possible afford satisfaction both to the staff and the firm (in terms of its cost structures and desire for profitability/surplus).
Centralisation for HF is essential to the organisation and a natural consequence of organising. This issue does not go away even where flatter, devolved organisations occur. Decentralisation - is frequently centralisaed-decentralisation !!! The modes of control over the actions and results of devolved organisations are still matters requiring considerable attention.
The scalar chain of command of reporting relationships from top executive to the ordinary shop operative or driver needs to be sensible, clear and understood.
The level of generalisation becomes difficult with this principle. Basically an organisation "should" provide an orderly place for each individual member - who needs to see how their role fits into the organisation and be confident, able to predict the organisations behaviour towards them. Thus policies, rules, instructions and actions should be understandable and understood. Orderliness implies steady evolutionary movement rather than wild, anxiety provoking, unpredictable movement.
Equity, fairness and a sense of justice "should"pervade the organisation - in principle and practice.
Time is needed for the employee to adapt to his/her work and perform it effectively. Stability of tenure promotes loyalty to the organisation, its purposes and values.
At all levels of the organisational structure, zeal, enthusiasm and energy are enabled by people having the scope for personal initiative. (Note: Tom Peters recommendations in respect of employee empowerment)
Here Fayol emphasises the need for building and maintaining of harmony among the work force , team work and sound interpersonal relationships.
examine the future and draw up plans of action
build up the structure, material and human of the undertaking
maintain activity among the personnel
bind together, unify and harmonise activity and effort
see that everything occurs in conformity with policy and practise
Fayol also synthesised 14 principles for organisational design and effective administration. It is worthwhile reflecting on these are comparing the conclusions to contemporary utterances by Peters, Kanter and Handy to name but three management gurus. Fayol's 14 principles are:
A principle of work allocation and specialisation in order to concentrate activities to enable specialisation of skills and understandings, more work focus and efficiency.
If responsibilities are allocated then the post holder needs the requisite authority to carry these out including the right to require others in the area of responsibility to undertake duties. Authority stems from:
The R = A correspondence is important to understand. R = A enables accountability in the delegation process. Who do we cope with situations where R > A? Are there work situations where our R< A?"judgment demands high moral character, therefore, a good leader should possess and infuse into those around him courage to accept responsibility. The best safeguard against abuse of authority and weakness on the part of a higher manager is personal integrity and particularly high moral character of such a manager ..... this integrity, is conferred neither by election nor ownership. " 1916A manager should never be given authority without responsibility--and also should never be given responsibility without the associated authority to get the work done.
The generalisation about discipline is that discipline is essential for the smooth running of a business and without it - standards, consistency of action, adherence to rules and values - no enterprise could prosper.
"in an essence - obedience, application, energy, behaviour and outward marks of respect observed in accordance with standing agreements between firms and its employees " 1916
The idea is that an employee should receive instructions from one superior only. This generalisation still holds - even where we are involved with team and matrix structures which involve reporting to more than one boss - or being accountable to several clients. The basic concern is that tensions and dilemmas arise where we report to two or more bosses. One boss may want X, the other Y and the subordinate is caught between the devil and the deep blue sea.
The unity of command idea of having one head (chief executive, cabinet consensus) with agree purposes and objectives and one plan for a group of activities) is clear.
Fayol's line was that one employee's interests or those of one group should not prevail over the organisation as a whole. This would spark a lively debate about who decides that the interests of the organisation as a whole are. Ethical dilemmas and matters of corporate risk and the behaviour of individual "chancers" are involved here. Fayol's work - assumes a shared set of values by people in the organisation - a unitarism where the reasons for organisational activities and decisions are in some way neutral and reasonable.
" the price of services rendered. " 1916The general principle is that levels of compensation should be "fair" and as far as possible afford satisfaction both to the staff and the firm (in terms of its cost structures and desire for profitability/surplus).
Centralisation for HF is essential to the organisation and a natural consequence of organising. This issue does not go away even where flatter, devolved organisations occur. Decentralisation - is frequently centralisaed-decentralisation !!! The modes of control over the actions and results of devolved organisations are still matters requiring considerable attention.
The scalar chain of command of reporting relationships from top executive to the ordinary shop operative or driver needs to be sensible, clear and understood.
The level of generalisation becomes difficult with this principle. Basically an organisation "should" provide an orderly place for each individual member - who needs to see how their role fits into the organisation and be confident, able to predict the organisations behaviour towards them. Thus policies, rules, instructions and actions should be understandable and understood. Orderliness implies steady evolutionary movement rather than wild, anxiety provoking, unpredictable movement.
Equity, fairness and a sense of justice "should"pervade the organisation - in principle and practice.
Time is needed for the employee to adapt to his/her work and perform it effectively. Stability of tenure promotes loyalty to the organisation, its purposes and values.
At all levels of the organisational structure, zeal, enthusiasm and energy are enabled by people having the scope for personal initiative. (Note: Tom Peters recommendations in respect of employee empowerment)
Here Fayol emphasises the need for building and maintaining of harmony among the work force , team work and sound interpersonal relationships.
Administrative Management
Administrative theory focuses on humans and their behavior instead of worker efficiency. Science theory focuses on the efficiency of the workforce.
Henri Fayol's administrative theory of classical management specifies that an organization works best when roles are separated in different areas of work.
advantages and disadvantages of open office in an organisation?
The limitations of the administrative management approach includes; 1) it is management oriented rather than been people oriented in which does not support employee participation automatically leading to demotivation in most case. answered by anu fashakin
what is administration management theory
Administrative Management
Administrative theory focuses on humans and their behavior instead of worker efficiency. Science theory focuses on the efficiency of the workforce.
Administrative mgt theory is more people oriented, from top to bottom while scientific mgt theory is result oriented putting time as a key factor to organisational growth
Henri Fayol's administrative theory of classical management specifies that an organization works best when roles are separated in different areas of work.
rs today uses General Administrative Theory
advantages and disadvantages of open office in an organisation?
The limitations of the administrative management approach includes; 1) it is management oriented rather than been people oriented in which does not support employee participation automatically leading to demotivation in most case. answered by anu fashakin
Administrative theory refers to the set of principles and concepts that guide the management of organizations. It focuses on the study of how organizations are structured, how authority and decision-making processes are delegated, and how to improve efficiency and effectiveness in achieving organizational goals. Administrative theory is often associated with renowned scholars such as Henri Fayol and Max Weber.
scintific management theory focus on the work and worker , deal with worker as machine and maxemize personnel productivity. adminstrative management focus on the entire organization
Administrative theory provides a framework for understanding and improving organizational processes and structures. It helps managers make informed decisions, increase efficiency, and achieve organizational goals by offering principles and guidelines for effective management practices. By studying administrative theory, organizations can adapt to changing environments and enhance their overall performance.
Administrative theory helps organizations streamline processes, establish clear hierarchies, and improve decision-making. It provides a framework for effective management, delegation of tasks, and coordination of resources to achieve organizational goals. Additionally, administrative theory highlights the importance of specialization, division of labor, and standard operating procedures for enhancing efficiency and productivity in an organization.