• Physical Standards
• Cost Standards
• Capital Standards
• Revenue Standards
• Program Standards
• Intangible Standards
• Goals as Standards and
• Strategic Plans as Control Points for Strategic Control.
• Physical Standards: Physical standards are nonmonetary measurements and are common at the operating level, where materials are used, labor is employee, services are rendered, and goods are produced. They may reflect quantities, such as labor-hours per unit of output, sounds of fuel per horsepower per hour, ton-miles of freight traffic carried, units of production per machine-hour, or feet of wise per ton of copper, closeness of tolerances, rate of climb of an airplane, durability of a fabric, or fastness of color.
• Cost Standards: Cost standards are monetary measurements and like physical standards, are common at the operating level. The attach monetary values to specific aspects of operations. Illustrative of cost standards are such widely used measures as direct and indirect costs per unit or per hour, material cost per unit, machine-hour costs, cost per seat-mile, selling cost per dollar unit of sales, and cost per foot of oil well drilled.
• Capital Standards: There are a variety of capital standards, all arising from the application of monetary measurements to physical items. They have to do with the capital invested in the firm rather than with operating costs and are therefore primarily related to the balance sheet rather than to the income statement. Perhaps the most widely used standard for new investment, as well as for overall control, is return on investment. The typical balance sheet will disclose other capital standards, such as the ratios of current assets to current liabilities, debt to het worth, fixed investment to total investment, cash and receivables to payables, and bonds to stocks, as well as the size and turnover of inventories.
• Revenue Standards: Revenure standards arise from attaching monetary values to sales. They may include such as revenue per bus passener-mile, average sales per customer, and sales per capital in a given market area.
• Program Standards: A manager may be assigned to install a variable budget program, a program for formally following the developement of new products, or a program for improving the quality of a sales force. Although some subjective judgment may have to be applied in appraising program performance, timing and other factors can be used as objective standards.
• Intangible Standards: More difficult to set are standards not expressed in either physical or monetary measurements. What standard can a manager use for determining the competence of the divisional purchasing agent or the personnel director? What can one use for determining whether the advertising program is successful? Are supervisors loyal to the company's objectives? Are the office staff alert? Such questions show the difficulty of establishing standards or goals for clear quantitative or qualitative measurement.
• Goals as Standards: With the present tendency for better-managed enterprises to establish an entire network of verifiable or quantitative goals at every level of management, the use of intangible standards, while still important, is diminishing. In complex program operations, as well as in the performance of mangers themselves, modern managers are finding that through research and thinking it is possible to define goals that can be used as performance standards. While the quantitative goals are likely to take the form of the standards outlined above, the definition of qualitative goals represents an important development in the area of standards. For example, if the program of a district sales office is spelled out to include such elements as training sales people in accordance with a plan with specific characteristics, the plan and its characteristics themselves furnish standards that tend to become objective and therefore "tangible."
• Strategic Plans as Control Points for Strategic Control: Strategic control requires systematic monitoring at strategic control points and modifying the organization's strategy based on this evaluation. As pointed out earlier, planning and controlling are closely related. Therefore, strategic plans require strategic control. Moreover, since control facilitates comparison of intended goals with actual performance, it also provides opportunities for learning, which in turn is the basis for organizational change. Finally, through the use of strategic control, one gains insights not only about organizational performance but also about the ever-changing environment.
The traditional view of managers is that they have virtually unlimited control over the organization and its purpose, functions and operations and therefore that they alone are responsible for all its successes and failures. This can be called the omnipotent view of management. There is a second, and growing, point of view that suggests that much of the successes and failures of organizations is determined by external factors that cannot be controlled by managers. This is the symbolic view of management. Most likely a combination of both points of view provides the best explanation of management power and control.
Yes. Practically that is perfectly possible. A Critical Path is the longest path between the start and end points and it is possible that there are multiple critical paths. Critical Paths are extremely important while creating a project schedule
You add control accounts at strategically placed control points.
There are many principles of management case studies that are available via textbook and online. Focal points of these case studies include business management, HRM, SHRM, OB, and conflicts in negotiation management.
Strategic Control isn't very different but on some points like movements of the, it is implemented in order to identify the areas of issue or potential areas of the issue so that necessary adjustments can be made. A subset of management control whose aim is to regularly monitor and check routine business operations. At this point a good strategic and operational partner is important. Our market & industry expertise is built around a broad & loyal customer base. We know the Norwegian market & can provide support throughout the whole process and be your strategic and operational partner before, during, and after the establishment.
Coca-Cola has it's own management system - The Coca-Cola Management System (TCCMS). It is an integrated quality management program, which holds all of company operations systemwide to the same standards for production and distribution of products. Main goal of this system is to guarantee the highest standards in the management of product quality. TCCMS has integrated Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP).
Critical control points are specific points in a food production process where controls can be applied to prevent or eliminate a food safety hazard. These are crucial steps to ensure food safety, and they are identified through a Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) system. Monitoring and controlling critical control points is essential to prevent hazards that could endanger the safety of the food supply.
Pathogen Reduction and Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP), were imposed in 1996
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points
The Pathogen Reduction and Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points rule was instituted in 1996
Hazard analysis of critical control points
Critical-point control involves adjusting a system's parameters to optimize or stabilize its behavior near critical points, where significant changes occur. By carefully manipulating these parameters, it is possible to achieve desired outcomes or prevent unwanted system behaviors. This control principle is commonly used in various fields, such as engineering, economics, and biology.
difeine critical control point and give an example
HACCP stands for Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points. It is a systematic preventive approach to food safety that identifies, evaluates, and controls potential hazards in the food production process.
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points.
No.
An effective control system should be:AccurateTimelyObjective and ComprehensibleFocused on Strategic Control PointsEconomically RealisticOrganizational RealisticCoordinated with the Organization's Work FlowFlexiblePrescriptive and OperationalAccepted by Organization Members