a primary difference between Fayol and Taylor was that Taylor viewed management processes from the bottom up, while Fayol viewed it from the top down. Scientific management theory (F.W.TAYLOR'S) was concerned with increasing productivity of the shop and the individual worker while classical organization theory (HENRI FAYOL'S) grew out of the need to find guideline for managing such complex organization as factories
Henry Fayol treated management as its own discipline and used a systemic approach to analyze the process. Frederick Winslow Taylor applied scientific methods to management to reduce the wasting of resources.
wala akong sagot
Henri Fayol's contribution to management looked at how operations could work together. Frank and Lillian Gilbreth was improvement and focused on the human side.
Fayol has been described as the father of modern operational management theory (George, p. 146). Although his ideas have become a universal part of the modern management concepts, some writers continue to associate him with Frederick Winslow Taylor. Taylor's scientific management deals with the efficient organisation of production in the context of a competitive enterprise that has to control its production costs. That was only one of the many areas that Fayol addressed. Perhaps the connection with Taylor is more one of time, than of perspective. According to Claude George (1968), a primary difference between Fayol and Taylor was that Taylor viewed management processes from the bottom up, while Fayol viewed it from the top down. George's comment may have originated from Fayol himself. In the classic General and Industrial Management Fayol wrote that "Taylor's approach differs from the one we have outlined in that he examines the firm from the "bottom up." He starts with the most elemental units of activity-the workers' actions-then studies the effects of their actions on productivity, devises new methods for making them more efficient, and applies what he learns at lower levels to the hierarchy...(Fayol, 1987, p. 43)." He suggests that Taylor has staff analysts and advisors working with individuals at lower levels of the organization to identify the ways to improve efficiency. According to Fayol, the approach results in a "negation of the principle of unity of command" (p. 44). Fayol criticized Taylor's functional management in this way. "… the most marked outward characteristics of functional management lies in the fact that each workman, instead of coming in direct contact with the management at one point only, … receives his daily orders and help from eight different bosses…" (Fayol, 1949, p. 68.) Those eight, Taylor said, were (1) route clerks, (2) instruction card men, (3) cost and time clerks, (4) gang bosses, (5) speed bosses, (6) inspectors, (7) repair bosses, and the (8) shop disciplinarian (p. 68). - [1] - This, Fayol said, was an unworkable situation, and that Taylor must have somehow reconciled the dichotomy in some way not described in Taylor's works
The difference between Taylor and Fayol are the management strategies applied. Taylor makes use of scientific management while Fayol makes use of administrative management.
Some early management theorists include Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, and Max Weber. Taylor is known for scientific management, Fayol for his principles of management, and Weber for his bureaucracy theory.
a primary difference between Fayol and Taylor was that Taylor viewed management processes from the bottom up, while Fayol viewed it from the top down. Scientific management theory (F.W.TAYLOR'S) was concerned with increasing productivity of the shop and the individual worker while classical organization theory (HENRI FAYOL'S) grew out of the need to find guideline for managing such complex organization as factories
Henry Fayol treated management as its own discipline and used a systemic approach to analyze the process. Frederick Winslow Taylor applied scientific methods to management to reduce the wasting of resources.
Some key contributors to the development of management philosophy include Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, Max Weber, and Peter Drucker. Each of these individuals made significant contributions to the understanding and practice of management principles.
wala akong sagot
Henri Fayol's contribution to management looked at how operations could work together. Frank and Lillian Gilbreth was improvement and focused on the human side.
Contribution of Henri fayol to the management
Classical school of public administration includes scientific management and bureaucratic theory. Fayol (and Taylor) is representative of scientific management and top down approach. Weber is presenting bureaucratic theory - with his ideal types.
Henry Fayol is known for his 14 principles of management that emphasize the importance of unity of command, division of work, authority, and discipline. He also developed the concept of administrative management, highlighting the functions of planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling. Fayol's contributions laid the foundation for modern management practices and provided a structured framework for organizational management.
Fayol has been described as the father of modern operational management theory (George, p. 146). Although his ideas have become a universal part of the modern management concepts, some writers continue to associate him with Frederick Winslow Taylor. Taylor's scientific management deals with the efficient organisation of production in the context of a competitive enterprise that has to control its production costs. That was only one of the many areas that Fayol addressed. Perhaps the connection with Taylor is more one of time, than of perspective. According to Claude George (1968), a primary difference between Fayol and Taylor was that Taylor viewed management processes from the bottom up, while Fayol viewed it from the top down. George's comment may have originated from Fayol himself. In the classic General and Industrial Management Fayol wrote that "Taylor's approach differs from the one we have outlined in that he examines the firm from the "bottom up." He starts with the most elemental units of activity -- the workers' actions -- then studies the effects of their actions on productivity, devises new methods for making them more efficient, and applies what he learns at lower levels to the hierarchy...(Fayol, 1987, p. 43)." He suggests that Taylor has staff analysts and advisors working with individuals at lower levels of the organization to identify the ways to improve efficiency. According to Fayol, the approach results in a "negation of the principle of unity of command (p. 44)." Fayol criticized Taylor's functional management in this way. "… the most marked outward characteristics of functional management lies in the fact that each workman, instead of coming in direct contact with the management at one point only, … receives his daily orders and help from eight different bosses…(Fayol, 1949, p. 68.)" Those eight, Fayol said, were (1) route clerks, (2) instruction card men, (3) cost and time clerks, (4) gang bosses, (5) speed bosses, (6) inspectors, (7) repair bosses, and the (8) shop disciplinarian (p. 68). This, he said, was an unworkable situation, and that Taylor must have somehow reconciled the dichotomy in some way not described in Taylor's works.
Some key contributors to the development of management theory and philosophy include Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, Max Weber, and Elton Mayo. Taylor is known for his scientific management approach, while Fayol emphasized the administrative principles of management. Weber introduced the concept of bureaucratic management, and Mayo's Hawthorne studies highlighted the importance of human factors in the workplace.