Very few marsupials do not have pouches. In Australia, these include the numbat and the red-tailed phascogale. In North America, some species of opossum (not related to the possum) do not have pouches.
It is not known why some marsupials do not have pouches. The young joeys are still born undeveloped, and have to cling to the mother's underside, secured in place only by the fact that the teat has swollen in tbeir mouth.
Neither the numbat nor the Brown antechinus has a pouch. The swamp antechinus develops just a flap of skin for a pouch during breeding season. The kultarr and kowari also have just a fold of skin.
No. Marsupials have pouches. Marsupials include kangaroos, koalas, wallabies and so on.
They do not have pouches as they are not marsupials.
Marsupials have baby pouches. Kangaroos, wallabies, possums, and some others.
No. Skunks are placental mammals, not marsupials, so they do not have pouches.
No. Only marsupials have pouches. Birds lay eggs.
No. Mice are placental mammals, not marsupials.
No, lemurs do not have pouches like kangaroos or marsupials. Lemurs give birth to live young and do not have a pouch for carrying their offspring.
to birth their young in pouches.
Koalas and kangaroos are both mammals with pouches in which they rear their young. They are marsupials, and almost all species of marsupials have a pouch for this purpose.
It is called a maripul. (Not sure if that's the right spelling) Marsupials. ^^
No. Kinkajou are not marsupials, which are primarily the animals which have pouches. Kinkajou are placental mammals.
marsupials.