The Western Paradigm (not only scientific) proceeded in major jumps.
It started as Aristotelian Paradigm, and in 451 AC this spirit-body-split view was proclaimed as the view on life of the Catholic Church in the Council of Chalcedon
In the 17th century Descartes replaced the role of 'god' with 'ratio', without really changing anything. Since then the Western World is living in the Rational Paradigm, also called Western Scientific Paradigm, with myths like , 'consciousness', 'understanding'. 'intelligence',....
Paradigm
paradigm
paradigm
Paradigm
Scientists would have to make the new paradigm accepted in the scientific community. They may face a lot of opposition and skepticism.
umm for what? paradigm shift or scientific revolution?
The consensus paradigm assumes that there is a general agreement or shared understanding within a scientific community about certain theories or models. Inconsistencies can arise when new evidence, alternative interpretations, or paradigm shifts challenge this agreement, leading to debates, disagreements, and revisions within the scientific community.
paradigm
Paradigm Paralysis the paradigm became a local depression. A sucking prison of law and order, the paradigm became a local truth vacuum: all locals ('scientists' + believers) 'think' sincerely that their 'law and order' = common sense A whirlpool of local truth. ALMOST no way out . Example: The Western World.
Thomas Kuhn, an eminent historian and philosopher of science, is known for calling the process of replacing one paradigm with another a "scientific revolution" in his book "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." Kuhn's work has had a significant impact on the philosophy of science and our understanding of how scientific knowledge changes over time.
yes you can, in theory. But it is very difficult to change an established 'ruling paradigm' (however incorrect).
Paradigm is a noun, which means a certain way of looking at things. It can be used in the following example sentences: iPods changed the paradigm when it came to MP3 players. Global warming needs to be kept within the scientific paradigm. The current paradigm says that personal accountants are only for the rich.