A mother kangaroo has one pouch.
No. People are not kangaroos by any means. They do not have pouches.
They are not kangoroos. They do not have pouches.
No. The kangaroo rat is a rodent, so it does not have a pouch. It is not related at all to kangaroos. Only marsupials have pouches. The Australian rat kangaroo, a quite different creature, does have a pouch.
Marsupials have baby pouches. Kangaroos, wallabies, possums, and some others.
In kangaroo pouches at local zoos
sugar gliders tend to have the same poch as a kangaroo
Marsupial and fire-breathing dragons have pouches. The former copies a kangaroo's pouch, whereas the latter have pouches in their mouths for storing iron pyrite and flint which, when knocked together, produce sparks.
A kangaroo pouch is in fact also called a sac. Kangaroos will typically carry their young inside of these pouches.
A kangaroo is a mammal. A kangaroo is also a marsupial. Marsupials are animals that are classified by the females having pouches that they use to carry their young. Other examples of marsupials are Koalas and Wombats, both native to Australia, as is the Kangaroo.
Most marsupials have pouches. The pouched marsupials which are Australian animals include:kangaroowombatkoalapossumgliderTasmanian devilbandicootbilbypotorooquokkawallabywallaroopademelonphascogalequollrat-kangaroo (not kangaroo-rat)dunnartplanigalekultarrningauiwoylie
I've only heard them called pouches.