Absolutely
TRUE
Logically yes
False. All Woolies might be tollies but that doesn't mean that all tollies are necessarily woolies. Nor are all wamples necessarily tollies. So the answer is definitely false.
no
The chaps
Eurylochus convinces the men that the gods will be appeased if they sacrifice some of the cattle to them.
The tick.
Obviously NO!
terry woolies
at woolies
No. Although the statements W ---> T, T ---> A (Woolies, Tollies and wAmples) by transitivity lead to the statement W ---> A, the statement A ---> W cannot be derived from this, because of the rules of logic, without further information on the population of Wamples. What this means is that even though all Woolies are Wamples, not all Wamples may be Woolies and we cannot define either way without more information . If this further information was found and showed that all wamples are indeed woolies, then we could write both statements of A ---> W and W A.