They are not allowed to chuck anything.
The original tongue-twister is of unknown origin. In it,"How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?is paired with"A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could if a woodchuck could chuck wood."or"As much wood as a woodchuck would, if a woodchuck could chuck wood."
Lots of wood
Yes. After capturing so many of them to uncover the truth of how much wood it could actually chuck, scientists nearly depleted the wood chuck population. Yes. After capturing so many of them to uncover the truth of how much wood it could actually chuck, scientists nearly depleted the wood chuck population.
a wood chuck waood chuck all the wood he could chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood
Wood chuck wood chuck could
a wood chuck could chuck alot of wood if a wood chuck could chuck wood
a wood chuck would chuck wood as a woodchuck has wood and chuck in its name so a wood chuck could chuck wood. (if it trys) HA READ THAT OUT LOUD, SUMONE
a wood chuck would chuck wood as a woodchuck has wood and chuck in its name so a wood chuck could chuck wood. (if it trys) HA READ THAT OUT LOUD, SUMONE
The original meaning of the word chuck as it is applied in the case of the woodchuck is 'a dweller' in other words the 'dweller of the woods' or 'that thing that lives in the woods.' Used as a verb the word chuck means 'to throw'. So my opinion is no, woodchucks do not chuck wood.
As much wood as a woodchuck chucks if a woodchuck could chuck wood..... Riddle answer (It's not supposed to be scientific or just a number.) : As much wood as a wood chuck could chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood. See? Not scientifically just a tongue twister. BTW the question's supposed to be : How much wood can a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood? Similar : How much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood? Only difference is the would and can. See it?
It's actually 700 Lbs. of wood.