Its not tigers, its lions.
tigers would be called the "king" because they own the jungle .
Tigers are not actually considered the king of the jungle, as they typically reside in forests and grasslands rather than jungles. However, they are apex predators and top of the food chain in their habitats, exhibiting strength, power, and dominance which can be associated with being a "king."
The lion is called the "king of the jungle"but this is in error. Lions do not live in the jungle and tend to prefer the savanna. Tigers and jaguars do live in jungles and rainforests so would be more accurately credited with this title.
Generally speaking big cats, such as tigers, and panthers, and jaguars are considered king of the jungles. They eat monkeys for food.
Lions are often called the king of the jungle. which doesn't make any sense since they don't live in jungles. Lions live on mostly open grasslands. Tigers live in Forests and would fit much better as the king of the jungle.
No. Lions and tigers are both great hunters and are both equal.
While lions are known as the "king of the jungle," they do not live in jungles; they inhabit grasslands and savannas. Within the cat family, lions are not considered the largest; tigers hold that title. The term "king of the jungle" is often used to signify the lion's status as a powerful and dominant predator in its habitat.
thri is 2000 tigers
No, tigers live in Tiger Jungle.
The one in Rudayrd Kipling's "The Jungle Book" Shere Kahn and King Louie, as I believe their names to be.
NO! Lion is the king of the jungle.